7.207, Disc: Emphasis

[The Linguist List]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-7-207. Thu Feb 8 1996. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines:  69
 
Subject: 7.207, Disc: Emphasis
 
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu> (On Leave)
            T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <dseely at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Associate Editor:  Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
Assistant Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
                   Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
                   Annemarie Valdez <avaldez at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Editor for this issue: dseely at emunix.emich.edu (T. Daniel Seely)
 
---------------------------------Directory-----------------------------------
1)
Date:  Wed, 07 Feb 1996 12:21:43 GMT
From:  lrosenwald at WELLESLEY.EDU (Larry Rosenwald)
Subject:  emphasis
 
2)
Date:  Wed, 07 Feb 1996 10:50:18 PST
From:  slobin at cogsci.Berkeley.EDU (Dan I. Slobin)
Subject:  Re:  7.198, Disc: Emphasis
 
---------------------------------Messages------------------------------------
1)
Date:  Wed, 07 Feb 1996 12:21:43 GMT
From:  lrosenwald at WELLESLEY.EDU (Larry Rosenwald)
Subject:  emphasis
 
I'd respectfully disagree with James Jenkins' comments about the
Gettysburg Address.  In "of the people, by the people, and for the
people," I think it's right to stress the prepositions, since they're
what's changing;  Lincoln's oratorical emphasis would presumably
be on the "fact" that the government was not only "of" the people
but also "by" and "for" it.  But having said that, I'd like to add that
these discussions of emphasis remind me that there are real difficult-
ies in this area.  For example - there's a famous story about Samuel
Johnson and his friend the actor David Garrick.  Johnson wanted to
prove that actors didn't understand emphasis, so he asked Garrick
to read "thou shalt not kill."  Garrick read it with the emphasis
on "kill."  Johnson said that proved his incompetence;  of course,
said Johnson, the emphasis should be on "not."  To me it seems
clear that Johnson was wrong, but not clear why.  Best, Larry Rosenwald
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)
Date:  Wed, 07 Feb 1996 10:50:18 PST
From:  slobin at cogsci.Berkeley.EDU (Dan I. Slobin)
Subject:  Re:  7.198, Disc: Emphasis
 
Subject: Emphasis
 
Mark Mandel's analysis of Lincoln might make sense, but I recall
having read that, contrary to expectation, Lincoln stressed
"the people" each time.  His message was apparently that the
people were central, and not the functions of government.
 
Dan Slobin (slobin at cogsci.berkeley.edu)
Dept of Psychology
University of California, Berkeley
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-7-207.