6.1790, Disc: Phonemic Spelling

The Linguist List linguist at tam2000.tamu.edu
Mon Jan 1 15:48:45 UTC 1996


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-6-1790. Mon Jan 1 1996. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines:  58
 
Subject: 6.1790, Disc: Phonemic Spelling
 
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu>
            T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <dseely at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Associate Editor:  Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
Assistant Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
                   Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
                   Annemarie Valdez <avaldez at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Editor for this issue: dseely at emunix.emich.edu (T. Daniel Seely)
 
---------------------------------Directory-----------------------------------
1)
Date:  18 Dec 1995 16:04:57 +0800
From:  david_weiss at gbinc.com ("David Weiss")
Subject:  Re: 6.1756, Disc- Phonemic S
 
2)
Date:  Mon, 18 Dec 1995 18:06:28 EST
From:  amr at CS.Wayne.EDU (Alexis Manaster Ramer)
Subject:  Re: 6.1756, Disc- Phonemic S
 
---------------------------------Messages------------------------------------
1)
Date:  18 Dec 1995 16:04:57 +0800
From:  david_weiss at gbinc.com ("David Weiss")
Subject:  Re: 6.1756, Disc- Phonemic S
 
  RE>6.1756, Disc: Phonemic Spelling
How about Dutch and Czech, whose spelling systems are phemonenally loyal to
their languages' pronunciations?  (and what about Hebrew?)
 
David Weiss
david_weiss at gbinc.com
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)
Date:  Mon, 18 Dec 1995 18:06:28 EST
From:  amr at CS.Wayne.EDU (Alexis Manaster Ramer)
Subject:  Re: 6.1756, Disc- Phonemic S
 
Definitely not Modern Hebrew, where many distinctions are not marked
in the script at all.  Czech I think poses some of the same
difficulties as Polish in the case of morpheme boundaries and foreign
words (as does Dutch).  For those Dutch speakersd who have two
distinct "short-o" phonemes, that is not marked in the spelling
either.  Offhand, that's all I can think of.
 
Alexis
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-6-1790.



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list