7.986, Sum: "not (just) REAL sick"
The Linguist List
linguist at tam2000.tamu.edu
Fri Jul 5 19:42:40 UTC 1996
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-7-986. Fri Jul 5 1996. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines: 77
Subject: 7.986, Sum: "not (just) REAL sick"
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu> (On Leave)
T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <dseely at emunix.emich.edu>
Associate Editor: Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
Assistant Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
Annemarie Valdez <avaldez at emunix.emich.edu>
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
Editor for this issue: lveselin at emunix.emich.edu (Ljuba Veselinova)
---------------------------------Directory-----------------------------------
1)
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 1996 20:05:01 EDT
From: rowe at email.unc.edu (Charles Rowe)
Subject: sum: not (just) REAL sick
---------------------------------Messages------------------------------------
1)
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 1996 20:05:01 EDT
From: rowe at email.unc.edu (Charles Rowe)
Subject: sum: not (just) REAL sick
First of all, thanks to Susanne Borgwaldt, who sent me a correction
of the German equivalent. It should be:
Er ist halt nicht sehr krank.
I have now casually asked several informants how they would interpret
the sentence in question. Three informants were from eastern North
Carolina; one was from the Foothills (Piedmont) of NC; one spent most
of his life in the DC area. I present their interpretations in that
order. I asked them: "What does this sentence mean?"
'He's not just REAL sick."
a) "...means that a person does not have a serious life-threatening
illness."
b,c) "Both of us have decided that it means that he is somewhat sick
but not very, eg, minor illness."
d) "...means that he's ill; more than just a sniffle, but not ready
for the hospital."
e) "It means he's about to die!"
The distribution of these judgements leads me to believe that the
interpretation that I had originally offered (ie, essentially
corresponding to a-d) is indeed a Southernism. The (b) informant added
that he believes the construction is a Southernism, because
northerners had teased him when he used it.
Although all the Southern informants were North Carolinians, I do not
believe that the construction (or its interpretation) is restricted to
this area, because I am fairly sure that most such isoglosses in the
US cross state boundaries. More localized variant may obtain, of
course, but I hope to have controlled for this somewhat in using the
Piedmont informant.
It would be interesting to find out precisely where this isogloss
lies--especially its western boundary.
Charlie Rowe
rowe at email.unc.edu
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-7-986.
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list