7.892, Sum: English strong verbs

[The Linguist List]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-7-892. Fri Jun 14 1996. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines:  85
 
Subject: 7.892, Sum: English strong verbs
 
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu> (On Leave)
            T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <dseely at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Associate Editor:  Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
Assistant Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
                   Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
                   Annemarie Valdez <avaldez at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Editor for this issue: dseely at emunix.emich.edu (T. Daniel Seely)
 
---------------------------------Directory-----------------------------------
1)
Date:  Fri, 14 Jun 1996 11:02:05 +0900
From:  rrrtclff at pu-kumamoto.ac.jp (Robert Ratcliffe)
Subject:  sum: english strong verbs
 
---------------------------------Messages------------------------------------
1)
Date:  Fri, 14 Jun 1996 11:02:05 +0900
From:  rrrtclff at pu-kumamoto.ac.jp (Robert Ratcliffe)
Subject:  sum: english strong verbs
 
Summmary to English Strong V query
 
Many Thanks to the following people for their responses to my recent query
 regarding recent (since 1990) theoretical work which touches on English strong
 verb morphology: Bernd Wiese (Berlin, de), Chris Golston (Dusseldorf,de) Josep
h
 Tomei (Sapporo, jp), Lynne Cahill (Sussex, uk), Shannon McEwen (Alberta, ca.),
 Dirk Janssen (nijmegen, nl). (No u.s. responses oddly enough).
 
The search turned up a number of interesting looking articles in a variety of
 research traditions, to wit:
 
 
 
-Bloomer, Robert. 1994: System-Congruity and the Participles of
  Modern German and Modern English: A Study in Natural
  Morphology. Hamburg. Buske. (=Beitr$BgH(Je zur germanistischen
  Sprachwissenschaft. 6).
 
-Cahill, Lynne J. ``Syllable-based Morphology'', in COLING-90, Vol.3 pp.48-53,
	Helsinki, 1990.
 
 
-Cahill, Lynne J. ``Syllable-based Morphology for Natural Language 	
	Processing'', CSRP 181,
	School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex,
	1990 (DPhil
 dissertation).
 
-Golston, Chris ``direct optimality theory:representation as pure 	
	markedness''
 (to appear in Language Dec. 1996?)
 
- Hare, Mary and Jeff Elman (1995) Learning and morphological change.
	Cognition 56, 61-98
	
-Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alterations. Univ. of Chicago
	
	Press
 
- Ling, Charles and Marin Marinov (1993) Answering the connectionist
	challenge: a symbolic model of learning the past tenses of English
	verbs.
 Cognition 49, 235-290
 
- MacWhinney on Ling & Marinov, comment on above article in same volume
 
- Marcus (1995) Cognition, short paper about multilayer nets.
 
 
- Plunkett, Kim and V Marchman, 1993 "From rote learning to system building:
	acquiring verbal morphology in children and connectionist nets"
	Cognition 1993
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-7-892.