8.250, FYI: Public perception of linguistics

[linguist at linguistlist.org]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-8-250. Fri Feb 21 1997. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 8.250, FYI: Public perception of linguistics

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <seely at linguistlist.org>

Review Editor:     Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editors: Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
                   Ann Dizdar <ann at linguistlist.org>
Assistant Editor:  Sue Robinson <sue at linguistlist.org>
Technical Editor:  Ron Reck <ron at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Zhiping Zheng <zzheng at online.emich.edu>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <ann at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Fri, 14 Feb 1997 12:21:00 -0500
From:  Trey Jones <TJones at dataware.com>
Subject:  apparently linguists-are-no-damn-good

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Fri, 14 Feb 1997 12:21:00 -0500
From:  Trey Jones <TJones at dataware.com>
Subject:  apparently linguists-are-no-damn-good

Greetings, LINGUISTs..

I just got this from a friend on the TechWriting List.. Many of the
people over there hold linguistics and linguists in rather low regard.
I've had a couple of pretty fierce fights with some of them, only to
conclude that some people really will never see that anything other
than prescriptivism is acceptable, logical, or even sane.

There have been numerous discussions on LINGUIST in the past about the
public perception and understanding of linguistics, and what could be
done to improve both. Sadly, I fear that things have taken a turn for
the worse. Read on..

> From: Mark Halpern
> To: TECHWR-L at LISTSERV.OKSTATE.EDU
> Subject: linguists-are-no-damn-good paper finally published
> Date: Wednesday, February 12, 1997 4:31PM
>
> Colleagues,
>
> A long time ago, in a galaxy far away, I
> announced to you that a paper I'd written
> on linguists and their relation to correct
> usage was to be published in the Atlantic
> Monthly.  Probably few are still alive to
> remember that announcement, and those
> few probably think I must have been
> hallucinating -- and from time to time I'd
> have agreed with them. But the process
> has ground on, and finally spit the paper
> out: it will appear in the March issue, on
> the stands around the 25th of this month.
>
>  Of course what has been published is a
> radically abbreviated and somewhat
> bowdlerized version of what I wrote, so
> my pleasure is qualified, but I'm hoping
> that it's interesting or challenging enough
> as it stands to get people to request the
> full-strength version from me, which I'll be
> happy to send them.  The Atlantic posts
> the entire editorial contents of each issue,
> a couple of weeks after it hits the stands,
> to their Web site, and invites readers to
> engage in a dialogue with the authors;
> see you on the Web, I hope!
>
> Mark Halpern
> mhalpern@ scopus.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-8-250