8.307, Qs: Street Speech, Style sheet, Old English
linguist at linguistlist.org
linguist at linguistlist.org
Sun Mar 2 15:29:20 UTC 1997
LINGUIST List: Vol-8-307. Sun Mar 2 1997. ISSN: 1068-4875.
Subject: 8.307, Qs: Street Speech, Style sheet, Old English
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <seely at linguistlist.org>
Review Editor: Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>
Associate Editors: Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
Ann Dizdar <ann at linguistlist.org>
Assistant Editor: Sue Robinson <sue at linguistlist.org>
Technical Editor: Ron Reck <ron at linguistlist.org>
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
Zhiping Zheng <zzheng at online.emich.edu>
Home Page: http://linguistlist.org/
Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <seely at linguistlist.org>
==========================================================================
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
=================================Directory=================================
1)
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:02:25 -0500 (EST)
From: Larry Rosenwald <LROSENWALD at WELLESLEY.EDU>
Subject: Joyce, Dickens, and street speech
2)
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 18:22:30 +0200 (EET)
From: Lumme Erilt <lumme at colleduc.ee>
Subject: LSA style in LATEX
3)
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 18:37:35 +0000
From: Fernando Martinho <fmart at mail.ua.pt>
Subject: Old English adjectival inflection
-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:02:25 -0500 (EST)
From: Larry Rosenwald <LROSENWALD at WELLESLEY.EDU>
Subject: Joyce, Dickens, and street speech
Hi - the title of this query is probably more interesting than the
substance of it. A student of mine wants to look at Dickens' _Oliver
Twist_ and Joyce's _Ulysses_ in the context of whatever information she can
find about 19th-century London street speech (for Dickens) and early 20th-
century Dublin street speech (for Joyce).
I'd be grateful, on her behalf, for any citations people could send
me; they should be sent directly to me ( lrosenwald at wellesley.edu ), since
she's not on e-mail.
Thanks very much, Larry Rosenwald/ Wellesley College
-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 18:22:30 +0200 (EET)
From: Lumme Erilt <lumme at colleduc.ee>
Subject: LSA style in LATEX
Does anybody know whether there are available LSA stylesheet bibliography
styles for use in LaTex?
Yours,
Lumme Erilt
Lumme Erilt
Sytiste tee 43-203, EE0034 Tallinn, Estonia
Tel. 372-2-581257
-------------------------------- Message 3 -------------------------------
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 18:37:35 +0000
From: Fernando Martinho <fmart at mail.ua.pt>
Subject: Old English adjectival inflection
Dear Linguists,
I am working on aspects of adjectival inflection through Germanic and
Romance languages, and have some specific questions about English
adjectives. Sorry if it sounds trivial to some of you.
It is well known that modern English lacks adjectival inflection, at least
for features of gender and number (English adjectives have overt
superlative and comparative inflection, though).
According to some sources, however, it looks like English actually LOST
these adjectival gender and number features at some stage of its evolution,
contrary to other Germanic languages like Dutch and German (the latter is
refered to have 'rich' adjectival inflection).
Here is what I am interested in:
1.What kind of morphemes did old English use for gender and number features
within old adjectival inflection? Particularly, did morpheme 's' apply to
adjective number, as it did (and does) for nouns? Also, did old English
adjectives have some gender morpheme?
2.How do determiners (and quantifiers) behave with respect to the same
questions? Did old English determiners bear some kind of gender or number
inflection, contrary to modern determiners?
3.Exactly WHY did English adjectives lost their gender and number
inflection (but not their superlative/comparative inflection)? Did this
loss have some counterpart (like some kind of complementary distribution
with other lexical/functional heads)?
4.What exact references could help me explain WHY and HOW English
adjectives were affected by the loss of their inflection at some stage of
English evolution, proving that modern English (null) adjectival inflection
is the result of this loss? Also, are there any related Internet resources
available?
Some examples of sentences in old English with full inflected adjectives
would be welcome too :-)
Best,
Fernando
fmart at mail.ua.pt
http://sweet.ua.pt/~fmart
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-8-307
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list