9.454, Disc: Apple-Word
The LINGUIST List
linguist at linguistlist.org
Tue Mar 24 13:11:57 UTC 1998
LINGUIST List: Vol-9-454. Tue Mar 24 1998. ISSN: 1068-4875.
Subject: 9.454, Disc: Apple-Word
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Review Editor: Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>
Editors: Brett Churchill <brett at linguistlist.org>
Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
Elaine Halleck <elaine at linguistlist.org>
Anita Huang <anita at linguistlist.org>
Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
Julie Wilson <julie at linguistlist.org>
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
Zhiping Zheng <zzheng at online.emich.edu>
Home Page: http://linguistlist.org/
Editor for this issue: Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
=================================Directory=================================
1)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 08:46:34 -0500 (EST)
From: manaster at umich.edu
Subject: Re: 9.421, Sum: Apple-Word
-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 08:46:34 -0500 (EST)
From: manaster at umich.edu
Subject: Re: 9.421, Sum: Apple-Word
If there is indeed a connection between IE 'apple' and some
Afro-Asiatic word for 'genitals', and even if the former comes from
the latter via borrowing (as Theo Vennemann proposes)--and I am not
prepared to grant either of these "if"s just yet--it would not have to
follow that the "genitals" meaning is the older. It could be that
that the "apple" meaning was the original one in AA, that the
borrowing from AA to IE took place at the time when this was so, and
that a meaning shift (euphemism) took place in AA since that time. IE
would then preserve the original meaning which has been lost long
since in the source language.
AMR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-9-454
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list