10.1838, Sum: 10.1801 Eng.Complementizer
LINGUIST Network
linguist at linguistlist.org
Wed Dec 1 13:41:03 UTC 1999
LINGUIST List: Vol-10-1838. Wed Dec 1 1999. ISSN: 1068-4875.
Subject: 10.1838, Sum: 10.1801 Eng.Complementizer
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>
Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>
Associate Editors: Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
Scott Fults <scott at linguistlist.org>
Jody Huellmantel <jody at linguistlist.org>
Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>
Assistant Editors: Lydia Grebenyova <lydia at linguistlist.org>
Naomi Ogasawara <naomi at linguistlist.org>
James Yuells <james at linguistlist.org>
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
Chris Brown <chris at linguistlist.org>
Qian Liao <qian at linguistlist.org>
Home Page: http://linguistlist.org/
Editor for this issue: Naomi Ogasawara <naomi at linguistlist.org>
=================================Directory=================================
1)
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 09:57:13 +0000
From: "Neil.Salmond" <Neil.Salmond at durham.ac.uk>
Subject: Sum: Eng.Complementizer
-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 09:57:13 +0000
From: "Neil.Salmond" <Neil.Salmond at durham.ac.uk>
Subject: Sum: Eng.Complementizer
Thanks for my many helpers. Here's some of what they said:
Arne Martinus Lindstad <arnel at ilf.uio.no>
>>>
There is a new book out by Peter W. Culicover "Syntactic
Nuts" (Oxford University Press 1999), where he among other
things discusses the syntactic category of certain
complementisers and/or prepositions.
<<<
Anthea Fraser Gupta <a.f.gupta at leeds.ac.uk>
>>>
In many languages they [complementizers] are drawn from
other, more basic word classes.
(snip)
In the Indo-European languages in general the interrogative
words tend to be used as complementizers.
(snip)
In Old-English (as in other IE languages) there was a link
between pronouns and demonstratives. In OE many
conjunctions were made up of
combinations of prepositions and demonstratives. A good
book to read on the history of English in general is the one
by Pyles & Algeo, which also has an accompanying workbook
that explores some of these issues.
<<<
William Morris <wmorris at cs.ucsd.edu>
>>>
I highly recommend the following paper:
Dan Jackson (1998) The historical origins of the that-trace
effect. (0.9Megs) To appear in Linguistic Notes from La
Jolla, UCSD.
http://ling.ucsd.edu/~jackson/
<<<
Elly VanGeldern? <ellyvangelderen at asu.edu>
>>>
Complementizers typically derive (grammaticalize) from
determiners and prepositions.
<<<
Thanks again and have a very merry Christmas!
- Neil
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-10-1838
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list