10.1966, Review: Correction to review of Coleman
LINGUIST Network
linguist at linguistlist.org
Sun Dec 19 17:04:46 UTC 1999
LINGUIST List: Vol-10-1966. Sun Dec 19 1999. ISSN: 1068-4875.
Subject: 10.1966, Review: Correction to review of Coleman
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>
Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>
Associate Editors: Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
Scott Fults <scott at linguistlist.org>
Jody Huellmantel <jody at linguistlist.org>
Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>
Assistant Editors: Lydia Grebenyova <lydia at linguistlist.org>
Naomi Ogasawara <naomi at linguistlist.org>
James Yuells <james at linguistlist.org>
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
Sudheendra Adiga <sudhi at linguistlist.org>
Qian Liao <qian at linguistlist.org>
Home Page: http://linguistlist.org/
Editor for this issue: Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>
==========================================================================
What follows is another discussion note contributed to our Book Discussion
Forum. We expect these discussions to be informal and interactive; and
the author of the book discussed is cordially invited to join in.
If you are interested in leading a book discussion, look for books
announced on LINGUIST as "available for discussion." (This means that
the publisher has sent us a review copy.) Then contact Andrew Carnie at
carnie at linguistlist.org
=================================Directory=================================
1)
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 09:24:40 -0000
From: Stefan <stefan at ploch.freeserve.co.uk>
Subject: Re: review of Coleman's book
-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 09:24:40 -0000
From: Stefan <stefan at ploch.freeserve.co.uk>
Subject: Re: review of Coleman's book
Stefan Ploch: Corrigendum in relation to my review of
John Coleman, 1998, Phonological Representations. Their Names,
Forms and Powers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge et al.:
In my summary of Coleman's formalisation of Dresher & Kaye's (1990)
computational learning model for metrical phonology (cf. C)
Synopsis of CLM's chapter 4), I wrote that "Coleman can
successfully reformulate ... P(arameter) 5 'Feet are
quantitative-sensitive [Yes/No]' as '(syllable) --> O R' ". This is
a misrepresentation and occurred when I was eliminating
'unnecessary' information from the review text. Coleman's
reformulation goes a follows: The 'No' setting of P5 is already
captured by Coleman's formalisation of the syllable and quantity
sensitivity. His phrase structure rule for syllables is '(syllable)
- > O R' (CLM:156). Quantity sensitivity is expressed by the
feature [heavy], with [+heavy] for rhymes dominating branching
structure and [-heavy] or possibly unspecification for other
rhymes, in combination with a rule that specifies that syllables
are assigned the same weight as their rhyme: '(syllable):heavy =
R:heavy' (ibid.). For the 'Yes' setting of P5, Coleman proposes the
inclusion of an additional constraint in the grammar of a language:
'If P5 = Yes then [+heavy] (logical implication) (strong syllable)'
(ibid.). Finally, Coleman points out that this reformulation does
not cater for Dresher & Kaye's (1990:145) requirement that "in
quantity-sensitive stress systems all heavy syllables are
stressed". This "depends on the setting of the independent
parameter P7" (CLM:146), i.e. 'A strong branch of a foot must
itself branch [No/Yes]' (cf. CLM:157f. for further discussion of
P7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you buy this book please tell the publisher or author
that you saw it reviewed on the LINGUIST list.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-10-1966
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list