11.656, Qs: Quotations/US linguists, Null focused item?

[The LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-11-656. Wed Mar 22 2000. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 11.656, Qs: Quotations/US linguists, Null focused item?

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editors:  Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U. <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
		    Scott Fults, E. Michigan U. <scott at linguistlist.org>
		    Jody Huellmantel, Wayne State U. <jody at linguistlist.org>
		    Karen Milligan, Wayne State U. <karen at linguistlist.org>

Assistant Editors:  Lydia Grebenyova, E. Michigan U. <lydia at linguistlist.org>
		    Naomi Ogasawara, E. Michigan U. <naomi at linguistlist.org>
		    James Yuells, Wayne State U. <james at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Sudheendra Adiga, Wayne State U. <sudhi at linguistlist.org>
                      Qian Liao, E. Michigan U. <qian at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded jointly by Eastern Michigan University,
Wayne State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Jody Huellmantel <jody at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:39:45 +0100
From:  Gilles Bernard <gb at ai.univ-paris8.fr>
Subject:  Quotations from US linguists

2)
Date:  Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:02:25 -0800 (PST)
From:  Frederick Newmeyer <fjn at u.washington.edu>
Subject:  Can a focused item be null?

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:39:45 +0100
From:  Gilles Bernard <gb at ai.univ-paris8.fr>
Subject:  Quotations from US linguists


Getting older, I remember quotations without being able to remember
their authors. So if you can help me with these two quotations (as I
remember them) from US linguists :

- let us burn our phonetic boats
- the syntax of one era often becomes the morphology of a later era

The first quotation in young Hockett's time (was it Pike? Hockett?
anyway, by an extremist in the First Phonemic War -- before SPE), the
second quotation, as I seem to recollect, being in the sixties.
Or am I wrong?

Thanks.


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:02:25 -0800 (PST)
From:  Frederick Newmeyer <fjn at u.washington.edu>
Subject:  Can a focused item be null?


Normally (and for obvious reasons) an element in focus cannot be null,
even in a language that freely allows null arguments. If we speak a
null subject language and ask:

Who broke the dish?

The following reply is not very helpful:

____ broke the dish.

But notice that in English, the following exchange is not far-fetched:

Q: Who broke the dish?
A: You know who!

In other words, the speaker of the question is asked to pragmatically
retrieve the focus.

What I am looking for is a null subject language in which the following is
a conceivable exchange:

Q; Who broke the dish?
A: ____ broke the dish. (INTERPRETATION: 'You know who broke the dish!')

Does anybody know if such a language exists? Or any other situation in
which a (contrastively) focused element can be null?

Thanks!

- fritz newmeyer

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-11-656