11.2514, Sum: Languages Without Resultatives
The LINGUIST Network
linguist at linguistlist.org
Wed Nov 22 03:53:36 UTC 2000
LINGUIST List: Vol-11-2514. Tue Nov 21 2000. ISSN: 1068-4875.
Subject: 11.2514, Sum: Languages Without Resultatives
Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>
Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>
Editors: Karen Milligan, Wayne State U. <karen at linguistlist.org>
Michael Appleby, E. Michigan U. <michael at linguistlist.org>
Rob Beltz, E. Michigan U. <rob at linguistlist.org>
Lydia Grebenyova, E. Michigan U. <lydia at linguistlist.org>
Jody Huellmantel, Wayne State U. <jody at linguistlist.org>
Marie Klopfenstein, Wayne State U. <marie at linguistlist.org>
Naomi Ogasawara, E. Michigan U. <naomi at linguistlist.org>
James Yuells, Wayne State U. <james at linguistlist.org>
Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U. <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
Software: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>
Home Page: http://linguistlist.org/
The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.
Editor for this issue: Marie Klopfenstein <marie at linguistlist.org>
=================================Directory=================================
1)
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:45:28 +0100
From: Jose-Luis Mendivil <jlmendi at posta.unizar.es>
Subject: Languages without resultatives
-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:45:28 +0100
From: Jose-Luis Mendivil <jlmendi at posta.unizar.es>
Subject: Languages without resultatives
Dear Linguist List subscribers:
As a complement of a former query about languages with resultative
constructions such as English 'John hammered the metal flat' (Summary
11.2416) I posted a query asking for information about languages
which disallow such constructions.
The persons who responded to my query were (in chronological order):
Karine Megerdoomian
Asya Pereltsvaig
William B. Snyder
Natalia Koltsova
Annabel Cormack
Jesus Fernandez
Rick Mc Callister
Thank you very much to all.
Megerdoomian informed about Eastern Armenian and Persian, which
disallow these resultative constructions. She remarks that in these
languages there are causatives, but morphological or with a 'light'
verb:
Her examples are:
Armenian:
ch'ash-e Ara-in hivand-ats-rets
food-Nom Ara-Dat/Acc sick-CAUS-past/3sg
"the food made Ara sick."
Persian:
qhaza dara-ro mariz kard
food Dara-OBJ sick made-3sg
Both Pereltsvaig and Koltsova let me know that Russian does not allow
resultative secondary predicates of this kind.
Furhtermore, Snyder, Cormack, and Fernandez gave references to their
own work (or mailed it to me).
The references (that I consider suitable and outstanding in all cases) are:
Snyder, William (1995) _Language Acquisition and Language Variation:
The Role of Morphology_. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Beck, Sigrid and Snyder, William (in press) "Complex predicates and
restitutive _again_: Evidence for a semantic parameter." In
Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on
Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Cormack, Annabel & Neil Smith (1996): "Checking Theory: Features,
Functional Heads and Checking-Parameters". In UCL Working Papers in
Linguistics, 8: 1-40
Cormack, Annabel & Neil Smith (1999): "Why Are Depictives Different
from Resultatives?" In UCL Working Papers in Linguistics: 251-286
Papers by Cormack & Smith available at
http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/PUB/WPL/uclwpl.html
Fernandez Gonzalez, Jesus (in press): "Reflexiones sobre las
resultativas". In Actas del IV congreso de Linguistica General.
Cadiz: Universidad de Cadiz.
To conclude, I think the best way of summing up is to share with all
LinguistList readers the typology of resultatives provided by Snyder
(in a collaboration with Sigrid Beck):
American Sign Language YES
Austroasiatic (Khmer) YES
Finno-Ugric (Hungarian) YES
Germanic (English, German) YES
Japanese-Korean (Jpn., Kor.) YES
Sino-Tibetan (Mandarin) YES
Tai (Thai) YES
Afroasiatic (Egyp. Ar., Hebrew) NO
Austronesian (Javanese) NO
Bantu (Lingala) NO
Basque NO
Eskimo-Aleut (Inuttut) NO
Romance (French, Spanish) NO
Slavic (Russian, Serbo-Croatian) NO
Snyder remarks that this typology concerns the possibility of
resultatives of the form "Mary beat the metal flat" or "John wiped
the table clean", and that if at least one of these forms was
possible, in direct translation, they assigned the language a 'Yes'.
He also observes that they accepted as resultative constructions
which required an extra word 'become' (ASL, Thai, sometimes Mandarin)
or constructions whose result adjective required a special
morphological form (e.g. translative case in Hungarian or a
tense-less form in Japanese).
Again, thank you very much indeed for all your responses.
Best regards,
Jose-Luis.
-
*****************************************
Prof. Dr. Jose-Luis Mendivil Giro
Dept. of General and Hispanic Linguistics
Universidad de Zaragoza
C/ Pedro Cerbuna, 12
50009 Zaragoza (Spain)
Phone: (+34) 976 761 000
Fax: (+34) 976 761 541
E-mail: jlmendi at posta.unizar.es
If you send an attachment, please use RTF format
************************************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-11-2514
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list