12.1659, Qs: Possessive Nominalization,Innate Grammar Proof

[The LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-12-1659. Mon Jun 25 2001. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 12.1659, Qs: Possessive Nominalization,Innate Grammar Proof

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Editors (linguist at linguistlist.org):
	Karen Milligan, WSU 		Naomi Ogasawara, EMU
	Lydia Grebenyova, EMU		Jody Huellmantel, WSU
	James Yuells, WSU		Michael Appleby, EMU
	Marie Klopfenstein, WSU		Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U.
	Heather Taylor-Loring, EMU	Dina Kapetangianni, EMU

Software: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
          Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.



Editor for this issue: James Yuells <james at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:43:09 +0400
From:  "Yura Lander" <land_yu at mail.ru>
Subject:  Looking for Example of Possessive Nominalizations

2)
Date:  Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:47:58 -0700
From:  Paul Franckowiak <paul.franckowiak at riomail.maricopa.edu>
Subject:  Searching for a Particular Innate Grammar Ability Proof

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:43:09 +0400
From:  "Yura Lander" <land_yu at mail.ru>
Subject:  Looking for Example of Possessive Nominalizations

Dear linguists,

I am looking for data (and references) on possessive
nominalizations, that is when a possessor form can be used
(in an argument position) without a possessum. Typical
examples are

1) Russian uses (former) possessive adjectives as proper
names. E.g.,

"Ivanovo" (name of a town) < "Ivanovo" 'Ivan's' (with
sg.neut.agreement);
"Borisov" (personal name) < "Borisov" 'Borisov's'
(sg.masc.agreement);

2) Lezgian uses a genitive formant together with a plural
marker to form the so-called "associative plural":

Dide-d-bur
mother-GEN-SBST.PL
'mother and those with her'

Note that here another morpheme is added to the genitive marker.

3) English form "John's" in an argument position usually
means 'John's home'.

(Of course, such a phenomenon is impossible in head-
marking languages.)

If you have an example of "possessive nominalization",
please point also what is the normal possessive
construction (including such data as possible word order,
agreement patterns etc.) and predicative possessive
construction ("This house is John's") in that language.

Thank you.
Best wishes,

Yura

******************************
Yura Lander
land_yu at pisem.net

Yury A. Lander
Dept. of Languages
Institute of Oriental Studies
Rozhdestvenka, 12
Moscow 103031
Russia


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:47:58 -0700
From:  Paul Franckowiak <paul.franckowiak at riomail.maricopa.edu>
Subject:  Searching for a Particular Innate Grammar Ability Proof

I have a question regarding an example I heard that makes some strong
claims about innate grammar abilities.

There is a sentence about a boy who falls from a tree and bruises or
breaks his arm.  Later that evening in the bathtub, the boy's mother
notices another break or bruise.  The boy then makes a claim about when
the injury occurred.

I have heard this sentence and the claims that can be made from it by
many different linguists.  I don't remember the exact wording of the
story and I remember the wording to be crucial to the story serving as
an example.

I would like to share this sentence/story  (along with the names of the
people who helped me to re-locate it)  with my community college
students.  I have looked through my old text books and can not find it.

<< I did see a documentary where the great Noam Chomsky was discussing
the example, so I imagine that the example is pretty popular.>>

That last sentence follows along the lines of the example I am seeking.

The difference being that in my sentence it is not clear why I think the
example is popular <because of the person discussing it or because it
was in a televised documentary.> and in the example I am seeking the
reason is clear.

Thank you for any information you can provide.  I am hoping that in the
cosmic scheme of things, something will come back to me.

Yours in Linguistic Study,

Paul


-
Paul Franckowiak
Curriculum Writer
Rio Salado Community College
e-mail: paul.franckowiak at riomail.maricopa.edu
Phone: (480) 517-8224
Fax: (480) 517-8229

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-12-1659