12.2573, Qs: Ejectives, Clitics vs. Full Forms

[LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-12-2573. Mon Oct 15 2001. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 12.2573, Qs: Ejectives, Clitics vs. Full Forms

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Editors (linguist at linguistlist.org):
	Karen Milligan, WSU 		Naomi Ogasawara, EMU
	Jody Huellmantel, WSU		James Yuells, WSU
	Michael Appleby, EMU		Marie Klopfenstein, WSU
	Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U.	Heather Taylor-Loring, EMU
	Dina Kapetangianni, EMU		Richard Harvey, EMU
	Karolina Owczarzak, EMU		Renee Galvis, WSU

Software: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
          Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.



Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.


=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Sat, 13 Oct 2001 16:17:48 -0700
From:  "Barbara Riley" <briley at hawaii.edu>
Subject:  A question regarding ejectives

2)
Date:  Sun, 14 Oct 2001 19:19:29 +0900
From:  "Mark Mitchell" <mark_mitchell at kmug.org>
Subject:  Different functions of clitics and full forms

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Sat, 13 Oct 2001 16:17:48 -0700
From:  "Barbara Riley" <briley at hawaii.edu>
Subject:  A question regarding ejectives




Aloha,

I am new to the Linguist List and so I am not familiar with the proper
protocol for inquiring, so please pardon any faux pas that I will
likely ake.  I will gladly compile the responses that I receive and
write up a report and I will certainly credit any information that I
use in my dissertation.

I would like to know if someone can give me information on ejectives,
particularly t' and k' and the most common direction of lenition.
Please forward any responses to ofcc at aloha.net.

Mahalo nui loa,
Barbara Riley
University of Hawaii,
PhD Student, A.B.D.


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  Sun, 14 Oct 2001 19:19:29 +0900
From:  "Mark Mitchell" <mark_mitchell at kmug.org>
Subject:  Different functions of clitics and full forms


Hello all.  I'm looking for references, particularly recent corpus
based research, that addresses the different functions of clitics (or
affixes, fusions, contractions..ie. abbreviated forms) and the
corresponding full forms.  I'm especially interested in the different
pragmatics/semantics of English "will' versus "x'll" and "going to"
vs. "gonna".

An example of the latter occured in the popular US TV show 'Friends':

Chandler: "We wanted to kiss at midnight but nobody else is going
to...so...."

<<short snip>

Joey:  "Hey Rache, listen, I'm gonna kiss you at midnight."

Why does Chandler choose the full form and Joey the abbreviated
version?

And an example of the former occurs in another episode of the same
show:

Ross (trying, absurdly, to return a couch to the store that he has had
to cut in half):

"I'm a reasonable man.  I WILL accept store credit."

Store Employee: "I'll give you store credit in the amount of $4. "

Ross: "I WILL take it"

An essential part of the comedy of the scene comes from Ross's use of
the full form, which sounds ridiculous, especially in contrast to the
store employee's natural use of the abbreviated form.

Any help will be appreciated.  I will of course post a summary to the
list.  (Why did I choose "will" in that sentence?")  Thank you,

mark mitchell
Japan

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-12-2573