12.2662, Disc: Review: Davies/Pearse, Success in Eng Teaching
LINGUIST List
linguist at linguistlist.org
Thu Oct 25 03:25:40 UTC 2001
LINGUIST List: Vol-12-2662. Wed Oct 24 2001. ISSN: 1068-4875.
Subject: 12.2662, Disc: Review: Davies/Pearse, Success in Eng Teaching
Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>
Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona
Editors (linguist at linguistlist.org):
Karen Milligan, WSU Naomi Ogasawara, EMU
Jody Huellmantel, WSU James Yuells, WSU
Michael Appleby, EMU Marie Klopfenstein, WSU
Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U. Heather Taylor-Loring, EMU
Dina Kapetangianni, EMU Richard Harvey, EMU
Karolina Owczarzak, EMU Renee Galvis, WSU
Software: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>
Home Page: http://linguistlist.org/
The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.
Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>
=================================Directory=================================
1)
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 22:30:34 -0400
From: "Luz Vasqez" <luzmarinave at hotmail.com>
Subject: Response to Ronald Sheen's request
-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 22:30:34 -0400
From: "Luz Vasqez" <luzmarinave at hotmail.com>
Subject: Response to Ronald Sheen's request
Re: LINGUIST 12.2595
In addressing Ronald Sheen's first inquiry regarding Davies and
Pearse's book, I have to admit that, indeed, these authors do not
provide explicit empirical or comparative data supporting their
approach to teaching English. After providing a review of the
historical development of the various approaches to second language
teaching, the authors do however, state that their theoretical
framework falls under the communicative approach, but no mention is
made to any theories on SLA. The same as with most reference books
written for language teachers, Davies and Pearse's is a book whose
suggestions are presumably based on the authors' experience in the
classroom. It is briefly stated in the book that both authors have
had wide teacher training experience in Mexico. Nonetheless, and
despite what might seem a "pitfall", as an ESL learner and teacher
myself, I believe that language teaching theories and recommendations
based on one's teaching experience are certainly reliable. A language
teacher who has taught for ten or more years would have enough
experience to evidence what "seems to work" in the classroom. Yet, I
appreciate Sheen's inquiry, as it made me realize the importance of
specifying whether one's suggestions and approaches to language
teaching are based solely on one's own teaching experience; this would
avoid ambiguities like the that found in "Success in English
Teaching".
Even though, and as stated by Sheen, the suggestions offered in Davies
and Pearse might seem obvious or based on "the flimsiest of evidence",
I do not have evidence to support such a statement about the book in
question.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-12-2662
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list