13.2520, Diss: Phonology: Smilijanic "Lexical..."
LINGUIST List
linguist at linguistlist.org
Thu Oct 3 17:41:27 UTC 2002
LINGUIST List: Vol-13-2520. Thu Oct 3 2002. ISSN: 1068-4875.
Subject: 13.2520, Diss: Phonology: Smilijanic "Lexical..."
Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona
Consulting Editor:
Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>
Editors (linguist at linguistlist.org):
Karen Milligan, WSU Naomi Ogasawara, Arizona U.
James Yuells, EMU Marie Klopfenstein, WSU
Michael Appleby, EMU Heather Taylor, EMU
Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U. Richard John Harvey, EMU
Dina Kapetangianni, EMU Renee Galvis, WSU
Karolina Owczarzak, EMU Anita Huang, EMU
Tomoko Okuno, EMU Steve Moran, EMU
Lakshmi Narayanan, EMU Sarah Murray, WSU
Marisa Ferrara, EMU
Software: Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>
Zhenwei Chen, E. Michigan U. <chen at linguistlist.org>
Prashant Nagaraja, E. Michigan U. <prashant at linguistlist.org>
Home Page: http://linguistlist.org/
The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.
Editor for this issue: Karolina Owczarzak <karolina at linguistlist.org>
=================================Directory=================================
1)
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 15:37:16 +0000
From: rajka at northwestern.edu
Subject: Phonology: Smilijanic "Lexical, Pragmatic and Positional..."
-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 15:37:16 +0000
From: rajka at northwestern.edu
Subject: Phonology: Smilijanic "Lexical, Pragmatic and Positional..."
New Dissertation Abstract
Institution: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2002
Author: Rajka Smiljanic
Dissertation Title:
Lexical, Pragmatic and Positional Effects on Prosody in Two Dialects
of Croatian and Serbian: An Acoustic Study
Linguistic Field:
Phonology, Phonetics
Dissertation Director 1: Jennifer S. Cole
Dissertation Director 2: Jose I. Hualde
Dissertation Director 3: Zsuzsanna Fagyal
Dissertation Director 4: Hans H. Hock
Dissertation Abstract:
This thesis investigates the interplay of lexical, pragmatic and
prosodic factors in determining the pitch contours and durational
patterns in two dialects of Serbian and Croatian (S/C): the Belgrade
dialect with lexical duration and pitch contrasts and the Zagreb
dialect without such contrasts. More specifically, it examines the
effects of lexical pitch and vowel length contrasts, of pragmatic
narrow focus and of the position within a prosodic phrase on
durational patterns and on the alignment of tonal targets, such as F0
peaks and valleys, with the segmental string through a comparative
study of two dialects. Furthermore, this is an investigation of how
the presence or absence of phonological contrasts in pitch and
duration affects the expression of focus and how/if it constrains the
effects of tonal crowding/proximity to intonational boundaries in
these two dialects. The goal of this thesis is to answer the following
related questions: 1) What role do lexical, pragmatic and prosodic
factors play in shaping pitch contours and duration patterns in S/C?
2) How does the presence vs. absence of a lexical pitch and vowel
length contrast limit pragmatic and prosodic effects on the alignment
of pitch targets, on the pitch-range, and on duration? 3) Are there
differences between pragmatic and prosodic boundary effects on F0 peak
alignment? 4) How are distinct categories that are defined in the
phonology of a language implemented phonetically?
Briefly, the results of the acoustic studies conducted show that there
is a difference between the two dialects in their phonological
properties: as mentioned, the Belgrade dialect has a pitch-accent and
vowel length contrast while the Zagreb dialect does not. Lexical
pitch-accent and vowel length contrasts are found to influence the
expression of pragmatic focus: the phonemic contrasts are enlarged in
narrow focus. Tonal crowding in the phrase-final positions
additionally affects tonal alignment regardless of the presence or
absence of the lexical pitch-accent contrast. These results have
implications for the typology of the prosodic systems, for
Intonational Phonology, and for phonetic implementation of
phonological contrasts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-13-2520
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list