14.2091, Sum: Trivalent Verbs, Passives and Agreement

[LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-14-2091. Thu Aug 7 2003. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 14.2091, Sum: Trivalent Verbs, Passives and Agreement

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Wed, 06 Aug 2003 22:10:14 +0000
From:  Mark Donohue <mark at donohue.cc>
Subject:  Passives with object agreement

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Wed, 06 Aug 2003 22:10:14 +0000
From:  Mark Donohue <mark at donohue.cc>
Subject:  Passives with object agreement

A few weeks ago, which in my personal chronology is one major logic
board failure in my computer ago, I posted a query about the
occurrence of complex predicates in which the one verb form appears
with both passive morphology and object-agreement marking, for two
different arguments (either a base ditransitive, or a derived verb). I
cited some examples from Pancana, an Austronesian language from
Southeast Sulawesi, which *almost* shows this pattern, and asked if
anyone knew of any more languages that did this, less ambiguously
(Linguist 14.1833).

It is indeed possible for a language to permit object marking when the
clause is passive, as long as were talking about a different
object. Examples come from KiChaga, Haya and Runyambo.

Swahili also allows the object marking + passive on the one verb, but
under strict restrictions. The logic board crash unfortunately
destroyed the example I was so kindly sent, but it does happen.

KiChaga (tone marks omitted) (Bresnan and Moshi 1990)
M-ka	n-a-i-ki-lyi-o
1-wife	FOC-1S-PR-7O-eat-APPL-PASS
The wife is being [benefitted/adversely affected] by someones eating
it.

Runyambo (Rugemalira 1993: 229)

omwáná	a-ka-bi-reet-er-w-á	omuséija
child	she-PAST-them-bring-APPL-PASS-FV	man
the child was brought them by a man

The following Haya example is a base-ditransitive verb, applicativised
(which makes for four core arguments), and then passivised; that
leaves room for two object prefixes:

Haya
omwaan	a-ka-ga-ba-siig-il-w-a	Kato
child	he-P3-it-them-smear-APPL-PASS-Kato
the child was smeared oil for them by Kato.

All interesting, and all Bantu. Id be curious to see if this happens
anywhere else: so far weve got multiple Bantu attestations, and some
near-misses in Austronesian. Any other takers?

Thanks to Alex Alsina and the now anonymous Swahili-information giver
for references and examples.

References:

Bresnan, Joan, and Lioba Moshi. 1990. Object asymmetries in
comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 147-185.

Duranti, Alessandro and Ernest Rugwa Byarushengo. 1977. On the notion
of ''direct object''. In E.R. Byarushengo, A Duranti, and L.M. Hyman,
eds., Haya grammatical structure (Southern California Occasional
Papers in Linguistics No. 6): 45-71.

Rugemalira, Josephat M. 1993. Bantu multiple object
constructions. Linguistic Analysis 23 (3-4): 226-252.

-Mark Donohue

Language-Family:  Niger-Congo; Code: NC

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-14-2091