14.789, Disc: Performatives and Meaning

[LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-14-789. Tue Mar 18 2003. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 14.789, Disc: Performatives and Meaning

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================
FUND DRIVE 2003

Thanks to the generosity of our subscribers we were able to reach the
$10,000 mark in record time. Because of this we were able to secure a
$1,500 donation from John Benjamins Publishing - a big thank you to
all the crew at JBs!

But we still have a long way to go! Please help us reach our total of
$50,000 by making a donation at:

http://linguistlist.org/donation.html

The LINGUIST List depends on the generous contributions from
subscribers like you; we would not be able to operate without your
help.

The moderators, staff, and student editors at LINGUIST would like to
take this opportunity to thank you for your continuous support.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Mon, 17 Mar 2003 17:44:00 -0500
From:  "mjmurphy" <4mjmu at rogers.com>
Subject:  Re: 14.767: Performatives and Meaning

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Mon, 17 Mar 2003 17:44:00 -0500
From:  "mjmurphy" <4mjmu at rogers.com>
Subject:  Re: 14.767: Performatives and Meaning

In Linguist 14.767
Ahmad R. Lotfi wrote:


> Apart from what Lycan himself has in mind concerning the meaning of
> meaning, one may take this example as some support for Ayer's claim
> that unless a sentence can be verified (in principle), it's
> meaningless. Lycan's sentences do make sense (and we understand them
> even if we don't accept them) for the very reason that they can be
> falsified. Wittgenstein (also Austin) rejects this as performatives
> (sentences used to perform acts of the very sort named by the verb,
> e.g.  (1) ''The meeting is adjourned'') are neither true nor
> false. They can only be evaluated as felicitous or infelicitous. Then
> meaning is more than verifiability as performatives do make sense (and
> we understand them) although they are not verifiable (in principle).
>
> What disturbs me, however, is the fact that once a performative
> sentence is changed in its tense, e.g. (2) ''The meeting was adjourned
> right now'', it stops being a performative, and (as a result)it can be
> verified. Though this is still in agreement with Wittgenstein and
> Austin's reasoning, it also raises the question of how real-time
> hearers ''understand'' a performative. One possibility is that the
> moment the chair utters (1), they construct (2), and then (and only
> then) they understand (1) as meaningful. ''I hereby know a lady named
> Maxine'' doesn't normally make any sense because ''Adolf Hitler knew a
> lady named Maxine right now'' doesn't make sense either. If so, then
> even  performatives are still understood as sentences verifiable in
> principle.




Careful,

A similar argument is often made to show that performative utterances
can be "reduced" to statements.  I think the argument generally fails,
In the case above, even if things worked as you've described
(concerning the processing of performatives), you would not have shown
the perfomatives are verifiable.  Rather, you have only shown that
they are linked with certain sentences that are verifiable; they are
understood through these sentences perhaps.  Nor really can you can
that "performatives are....understood as sentences verifiable in
principle."  They are understood as performatives; you have only shown
that to be be understood as performatives the hearer must come to an
understanding of a verifiable sentence which is a construct from the
performative.

Different thing entirely.

Cheers,

M.J.Murphy

The shapes of things are dumb.
-L. Wittgenstein


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-14-789