14.1364, Qs: Semantic Restrictions
LINGUIST List
linguist at linguistlist.org
Tue May 13 01:55:58 UTC 2003
LINGUIST List: Vol-14-1364. Mon May 12 2003. ISSN: 1068-4875.
Subject: 14.1364, Qs: Semantic Restrictions
Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona
Home Page: http://linguistlist.org/
The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.
Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox at linguistlist.org>
==========================================================================
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
=================================Directory=================================
1)
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 21:51:14 +0000
From: Seth Minkoff <seth.minkoff at umb.edu>
Subject: Semantic restrictions on passive or other "voices"
-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 21:51:14 +0000
From: Seth Minkoff <seth.minkoff at umb.edu>
Subject: Semantic restrictions on passive or other "voices"
Dear Linguist readers:
I am looking for any references on literature dealing with semantic
restrictions on passive, dative shift, antipassive, or other ''voice
alternations'' (in any language): for example, works addressing the
unacceptability of sentences like (1) - (2).
(1) *Mary was resembled by Sally. (cf. Sally resembled Mary.)
(2) *Mary sent the store Sally. (cf. Mary sent Sally to the store.)
I will post a summary of responses. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Seth A. Minkoff
Hispanic Studies
UMass-Boston
seth.minkoff at umb.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-14-1364
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list