14.2908, Sum: English Adjective Inflections

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-14-2908. Thu Oct 23 2003. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 14.2908, Sum: English Adjective Inflections

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:36:14 -0600
From:  Dirk Elzinga <dirk_elzinga at byu.edu>
Subject:  English adjectives summary

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:36:14 -0600
From:  Dirk Elzinga <dirk_elzinga at byu.edu>
Subject:  English adjectives summary

Dear LINGUISTs:

On Wednesday, 1 October, I posted the following query (Linguist 14.2666):

Marking an adjective for the comparative or superlative degree in
English involves one of two strategies. The morphological strategy
suffixes -er or -est to the adjective base:

brown; brown-er, brown-est
silly; silli-er, silli-est
&c

The syntactic strategy uses the degree words 'more' and 'most' in
composition with the adjective:

intelligent; more intelligent, most intelligent
obtuse; more obtuse, most obtuse
&c

I am interested in published analyses of the choice between these two
strategies. It has been stated that the choice is based on the prosody
of the adjective, such that adjective bases which fit within a single
trochaic foot are more likely to show morphological comparatives and
superlatives, while adjectives which do not fit within that template
will show syntactic comparatives and superlatives. Can anyone point me
to relevant literature? I have thus far only been able to find
informal or "in passing" references to the prosodic nature of
adjective inflection in English, and I would appreciate being able to
look at a fuller treatment of the problem. I will be happy to
summarize the bibliographic information if there is interest.

I want to thank all who responded to my query: Robert Ryan, Yishai
Tobin, James Fidelholtz, Anette Rosenbach, Roger Lass, Tully Thibeau,
Sasha Andreyev(?), Ora Matushansky, Victorina Gonzalez-Diaz Janine
Graziano-King, George Smith, Britta Mondorf, and Adam Albright. What
follows is a summary of the bibliographic information that they
provided.

Booij, Geert, and Jerzy Rubach. 1984. Morphological and prosodic
domains in lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook 1 1-27.

Browne, E. Wayles. 196?. (paper published in the MIT Research
Laboratories for Electronics Quarterly Progress Report).

Gonzalez-Diaz, Victorina. forthcoming Ph.D. thesis, University of
Manchester.

Graziano-King, Janine. Ph.D. Dissertation.

Kytö, Merja and Suzanne Romaine. 1997. "Competing forms of adjective
comparison in Modern English: what could be more quicker and easier and
more effective?" In: Terttu Nevalainen and Tarkka Leena Kahlas (eds.).

To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in
Honour of Matti Rissanen, 353-373. Helsinki: Société
Néophilologique.

Lass, R. 'Phonology and morphology' in Lass (ed.) 1999, The Cambridge
History of the English Language: III, 1476-1776, Cambridge University
Press.

Matushansky, Ora. 2001. "The More the merrier: the syntax of synthetic
and analytic comparatives" handout from a presentation at GLOW 24.

Mondorf, Britta. 2003. "Supprt for more-support". In: Günter
Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds.). Determinants of Grammatical
Variation in English, 251-304. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Tobin, Yishai. 1990. Semiotics and linguistics. London and New York:
Longman. (final chapter)

In addition, several respondents reminded me of standard references
like Quirk, et al, the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, and
the Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English.

Thanks again to all who replied.

-
Dirk Elzinga
Department of Linguistics and English Language
Brigham Young University
Dirk_Elzinga at byu.edu

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-14-2908