15.260, Qs: English Spelling/Pronunciation Poem

[LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-15-260. Sat Jan 24 2004. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 15.260, Qs: English Spelling/Pronunciation Poem

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Sheila Collberg, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Sun, 18 Jan 2004 19:09:21 -0500
From:  "Alan Roberts" <a.roberts at adelphia.net>
Subject:  looking for pronunciation poem

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Sun, 18 Jan 2004 19:09:21 -0500
From:  "Alan Roberts" <a.roberts at adelphia.net>
Subject:  looking for pronunciation poem

I was looking on the Internet for a poem that I heard a LONG time ago
regarding the various pronunciations of "ough" in English.  I made contact
with a person who suggested that I post an inquiry here.

The poem was similar to the one below that I did find, but it was different
(and, if I recall accurately, better).  It introduced a pronunciation of
"ough" and then had it misused by a student, increasing his frustration
until he finally "hit him with a rough" (rock).  Anyone familiar with such a
version?
- -------------------
OUGH


"Charles Battell Loomis, quoted in _Our Accursed Spelling_, edited by
E.O. Vaile."  Blancke, Wilton W. (1953), _General Principles of
Language and Experiences in Language, Revised_, ed. by Richard
D. Abraham (Boston: D.C. Heath).

I'm taught p-l-o-u-g-h
Shall be pronounced "Plow."
"Zat's easy when you know," I say,
"Mon Anglais I'll get through."

My teacher say zat in zat case
O-u-g-h is "oo."
And zen I laugh and say to him
"Zees Anglais make me cough."

He say, "Not coo, but in zat word
O-u-g-h is `off.'"
O sacre bleu!  Such varied sound
Of words make me hiccough.

He says, "Again my friend is wrong;
O-u-g-h is `uff.'"
I say, "I try to spik your words,
I can't pronounce them, though."

"In time you'll learn, but now you're wrong;
O-u-g-h is `owe'!"
"I'll try no more, I shall go mad,
I'll drown me in ze lough."
- -------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-15-260