15.1430, Books: Syntax/Phonology: Gunlogson

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Wed May 5 21:34:49 UTC 2004


LINGUIST List:  Vol-15-1430. Wed May 5 2004. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 15.1430, Books: Syntax/Phonology: Gunlogson

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Sheila Collberg, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Neil Salmond <neil at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================
Links to the websites of all LINGUIST's supporting publishers are
available at the end of this issue.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:10:35 -0400 (EDT)
From:  kkaneta at taylorandfrancis.com
Subject:  True to Form: Gunlogson

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:10:35 -0400 (EDT)
From:  kkaneta at taylorandfrancis.com
Subject:  True to Form: Gunlogson


Title: True to Form
Subtitle: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English
Series Title: Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics
			
Publication Year: 2003			
Publisher:	Routledge (Taylor and Francis)
		http://www.routledge.com/
			
Author: Christine Gunlogson, University of Rochester, New York

Hardback: ISBN: 0415967813, Pages: 128, Price:  U.S. $: 65


Abstract:
			
This book is concerned with the meaning and use of two kinds of
declarative sentences:

1) It's raining?
2) It's raining.

The difference between (1) and (2) is intonational: (1) has a final
rise--indicated by the question mark--while (2) ends with a fall.

Christine Gunlogson's central claim is that the meaning and use of
both kinds of sentences must be understood in terms of the meaning of
their defining formal elements, namely declarative sentence type and
rising versus falling intonation. Gunlogson supports that claim
through an investigation of the use of declaratives as questions. On
one hand, Gunlogson demonstrates that rising and falling declaratives
share an aspect of conventional meaning attributable to their
declarative form, distinguishing them both from the corresponding
polar interrogative (Is it raining?) and constraining their use as
questions. On the other hand, since (1) and (2) constitute a minimal
pair, differing only in intonation, systematic differences in
character and function between them--in particular, the relative
"naturalness" of (1) as a question compared to (2) --must be located
in the contrast between the fall and the rise.

To account for these two sets of differences, Gunlogson gives a
compositional account of rising and falling declaratives under which
declarative form expresses commitment to the propositional content of
the declarative. Rising versus falling intonation on declaratives is
responsible for attribution of the commitment to the Addressee versus
the Speaker, respectively. The result is an inherent contextual "bias"
associated with declaratives, which constitutes the crucial point of
difference with interrogatives. The compositional analysis is
implemented in the framework of context update semantics (Heim 1982
and others), using an articulated version of the Common Ground
(Stalnaker 1978) that distinguishes the commitments of the individual
discourse participants.

Restrictions on the use of declaratives as questions, as well as
differences between rising and falling declaratives as questions, are
shown to follow from this account. Gunlogson argues that neither
rising nor falling declaratives are inherently questioning--rather,
the questioning function of declaratives arises through the
interaction of sentence type, intonation, and context.


Lingfield(s):	Phonology
		Semantics
		Syntax 	
			
Written In: English (Language Code: English)

     See this book announcement on our website:
	 http://linguistlist.org/get-book.html?BookID=9608


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAJOR SUPPORTERS

	CSLI Publications
		http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/	

	Elsevier Ltd.
		http://www.elsevier.com/locate/linguistics	

	Equinox Publishing Ltd.
		http://www.equinoxpub.com/	

	John Benjamins
		http://www.benjamins.com/	

	Kluwer Academic Publishers
		http://www.wkap.nl/	

	MIT Press
		http://mitpress.mit.edu/	

	MIT Working Papers in Linguistics
		http://web.mit.edu/mitwpl/	

	Mouton de Gruyter
		http://www.mouton-publishers.com	

	Rodopi
		http://www.rodopi.nl/	

OTHER SUPPORTING PUBLISHERS	

	Anthropological Linguistics
		http://www.indiana.edu/~anthling/

	Canadian Journal of Linguistics
		http://www.utpjournals.com/jour.ihtml?lp=cjl/cjl.html

	Cascadilla Press
		http://www.cascadilla.com/

	Graduate Linguistic Students' Assoc., Umass
		http://server102.hypermart.net/glsa/index.htm

	International Pragmatics Assoc.
		http://ipra-www.uia.ac.be/ipra/

	Kingston Press Ltd
		http://www.kingstonpress.com/

	Linguistic Assoc. of Finland
		http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/sky/

	Multilingual Matters
		http://www.multilingual-matters.com/

	Pacific Linguistics
		http://pacling.anu.edu.au/

	SIL International
		http://www.ethnologue.com/bookstore.asp

	Utrecht Institute of Linguistics
		http://www-uilots.let.uu.nl/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-15-1430



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list