15.2577, FYI: Assessing Well-formedness Using Google Script

[LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-15-2577. Thu Sep 16 2004. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 15.2577, FYI: Assessing Well-formedness Using Google Script

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Sheila Collberg, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Ann Sawyer <sawyer at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:30:33 -0700
From:  Danko Sipka <danko.sipka at asu.edu>
Subject:  Assessing well-formedness using number of hits in Google

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:30:33 -0700
From:  Danko Sipka <danko.sipka at asu.edu>
Subject:  Assessing well-formedness using number of hits in Google


Dear Linguists,

I frequently use Google to determine lexical and morphosyntactic
well-formedness of two options in various languages. I advise my
students to do the same. In order to save time required to go to
Google two times for one inquiry, I have created a simple script at:

http://cli.la.asu.edu/togoogleornot.htm

which lets you enter two options, choose the target language and then
get hits for both options in one window. For example, if a student of
English enters take the liberty as the first option and take a liberty
as the second, it will be possible to determine that the first option
is well-formed while the other is not. Similarly, if a student of
Russian enters v vuz as one option and na vuz as the other and selects
Russian as the target language, it will be obvious that the first
option is well formed while the second is not. A student of German can
check the gender of a noun, a student of Polish masculine inanimate
genitive singular ending, etc.

I plan to add lemmatizers for several Slavic languages which would make
it possible to search words in all their inflectional forms but even in
this form the script may be of interest.

Best,

Danko

Danko Sipka
Research Associate Professor and Acting Director
Critical Languages Institute (http://cli.la.asu.edu)
Arizona State University
E-mail: Danko.Sipka at asu.edu
Web: http://www.public.asu.edu/~dsipka

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-15-2577