16.94, Review: Neurolinguistics: Fabbro (2004)
LINGUIST List
linguist at linguistlist.org
Fri Jan 14 07:31:00 UTC 2005
LINGUIST List: Vol-16-94. Fri Jan 14 2005. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.
Subject: 16.94, Review: Neurolinguistics: Fabbro (2004)
Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org)
Sheila Collberg, U of Arizona
Terry Langendoen, U of Arizona
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/
The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.
Editor for this issue: Naomi Ogasawara <naomi at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
What follows is a review or discussion note contributed to our
Book Discussion Forum. We expect discussions to be informal and
interactive; and the author of the book discussed is cordially
invited to join in. If you are interested in leading a book
discussion, look for books announced on LINGUIST as "available
for review." Then contact Sheila Collberg at collberg at linguistlist.org.
===========================Directory==============================
1)
Date: 12-Jan-2005
From: Ramesh Mishra < rkm_du at yahoo.co.in >
Subject: Neurogenic Language Disorders in Children
-------------------------Message 1 ----------------------------------
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 02:28:19
From: Ramesh Mishra < rkm_du at yahoo.co.in >
Subject: Neurogenic Language Disorders in Children
EDITOR: Fabbro, Franco
TITLE: Neurogenic Language Disorders in Children
PUBLISHER: Elsevier Ltd.
YEAR: 2004
Announced at http://linguistlist.org/issues/15/15-2544.html
Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Lecturer in Linguistics. Dept. of Speech Pathology,
All India Institute of Speech and Hearing. Mysore, Karnataka, India
SUMMARY
This volume of papers on neurogenic language disorders in children, edited
by Franco Fabbro is the outcome of the International Symposium of the
IALP's (International Association for Logopedics and Phoniatrics) Aphasia
Committee on Neurogenic Language Disorders in Children, held in Cividale
del Friuli (Udine, Italy) in 2003. There are twelve papers in all and they are
self-contained with reference lists attached at the ends. Most of the papers
are from authors based in European scientific establishments. The papers
have not been divided into any groups. At the end of the book there are
subject and author indices. Various empirical and meta-analytical research
syntheses on different kinds of childhood neurogenic language disorders
(acquired childhood aphasia, Landau Kleffner's Syndrome, Crossed aphasia
etc) following different kinds of methodologies (radiological, behavioral,
case studies) have been assembled in this volume. In spite of their diversity,
they all address critical issues concerning diagnosis, prognosis and long
term outcomes of childhood neurogenic language disorders in children
because of acquired lesions in the brain. This is perhaps a first edited book
containing all the papers exclusively on an important theme like childhood
neurogenic language disorders. The book is addressed to researchers and
clinicians working in the field of aphasiology and neurogenic language
disorders in children and other researchers in neurolinguistics and speech
language pathology.
Franco Fabbro's introductory chapter (pp. 1-7) makes a clear categorization
of different childhood language disorders with neurogenic etiologies and
their specific differentiating features thus making the thematic background
for all following chapters. Fabbro's experience as an researcher and author
in the area of language pathology and neurolinguistics reflect in the clarity
of the statements he makes when he includes only a particular types of
childhood language disorders of neurogenic origin in this volume. May be
they are in the forefront of research (like epileptic aphasias and LKS). The
author gives the basic neurological symptoms of the common neurogenic
language disorders in children along with their linguistic correlates based
on which they are currently diagnosed. Fabbro raises the basic debate of
recovery of language abilities in children who have localized brain lesions
compared to adults who have aphasia. This issue is still controversial in
neurolinguistics. In the lights of new findings he says that "[in] relation to
acquired childhood aphasia, recovery from adult aphasia remains one of
the hotly debated issues today". Before the early 1970s language recovery
in children with aphasia was believed to be rapid and complete (Lenneberg,
1967). But many of the papers in this volume show that this is not the case
and children still suffer from several kinds of subtle language impairment
even after recovery from medical neurological symptoms (p. 2). This theme
of brain plasticity and language recovery from aphasia in children and
adults again discussed in many empirical studies in this volume. Fabbro
describes the genetic disorders like mental retardation, Down's syndrome,
William's syndrome, Fragile X syndrome, and Turner syndrome. But none of
the chapters are devoted to these disorders. In conclusion, the author
makes the very pertinent remark, "each single disorder should also be
studied keeping in mind the whole range of childhood language disorders"
(p.6)
Chapter 2 titled, 'Pathophysiological Basis of Aphasia and Verbal Outcome
in Landau-Kleffner Syndrome' (9-23) is by Marie-Noelle, Metz-Lutz and
Steve Majerus. It examines the diverse nature of verbal impairment in
children with LKS using ERP and PET. After providing a brief historical
background of this syndrome, the authors discuss clinical features of
acquired epileptic form aphasia, particularly those forms of the disorders
where they show that the typical EEG recorded during wakefulness showing
paroxysmal spike-wave discharges (SWDs) found in patients with LKS and
the typical EEG recorded during continued spike waves discharges during
slow sleep as a hallmark for the diagnosis of the disease. While discussing
the typical neuropsychological deficits observed in children with LKS the
authors analyze deficits in receptive language, auditory comprehension,
agrammatic language output while comparing finding with other published
results. A paragraph on clinical evolution of LKS includes the effect of
neurological abnormalities on the changing aphasic manifestations. The
authors observe that the actions of the anti-epileptic drugs on speech and
language behaviour in such patients have not been understood clearly so
far. Under the heading, ' Late Outcome of LKS', the authors draw n several
studies to focus on the nature of expressive and receptive languages in
patients with LKS after they have recovered. While discussing the
pathophysiological basis of epileptic aphasia, the authors review studies
that have shown metabolic evidences, neurophysiological findings and EEG
patterns in age-related focal epilepsy. The last section before the
discussions is devoted to the interpretation of findings from their earlier
studies, which show the evidence for persistent dysfunction in the superior
temporal cortex with impairment of the phonological short-term memory.
Then there is the evidence of reduced glucose uptake in the brains of the
patients with LKS in studies using PET. In the overall discussion section the
authors advance a provisional pathophysiological accounts of aphasic
disorders an late outcome of LKS and suggest a more or less direct
relationship between the epileptic activity which they call inhibitory and
induces phonological short-term memory and other types of verbal
impairments.
Chapter 3 by Roberto Tuchman is titled 'Acquired Language Disorders and
Epilepsy: From Landau-Kleffner's Syndrome to Autistic Regression' (25-35).
The paper starts with a rather comprehensive survey of literature on
acquirer aphasia with convulsive disorder with particular reference to LKS
and then discusses the regression in speech and language in children with
autism who also have epileptic form EEG. Towards the conclusion the
authors note that, ' acquired epileptic form aphasia associated with epilepsy
or epileptic form abnormalities are not specific entities. The studies
reviewed here suggests that they present part of a spectrum disorder with a
common pathophysiology with varying severity of clinical manifestations
dependent on the location and quantity of epileptic form activity (p.32).
Theses discussions raise the question of the exactness of relating EEG
results to clinical symptoms of a disorder for diagnosis purpose. Although
the advancement of such sophisticated techniques as EEG and
Magnetoencephalography have helped researchers to locate the precise
locations of neurological/chemical dysfunctions, but in a clinic one sees a
range of clinical symptoms which are difficult to link. This paper is not an
empirical investigation but presents a review-based analysis of other
research findings and offers a synthesis for looking at the disorder from r
pint of view.
Chapter 4 is titled 'Persistent Subtle Language and Learning Deficits in a
Child With Acquired Epileptic Form Opercular Syndrome' (37-48) is written
by Paula Cipriaui, Anna M. Chilosi, Claudia Casaliui, Luria Pfanner and
Giovanni Cioni. The chapter repots the findings of a three year long case
study of a child with Acquired Epileptic form Opercular Syndrome (AEOS) or
also known as Foix-Chavanny Marie Syndrome (FCMS) and focuses on his
persistent subtle long term language and learning difficulties due to
impaired phonological processing. In the introduction where the
symptomatic history of AEOS is given, the authors note that, "AEOS and LKS
would represent neurological disorders, sharing similar pathophysiological
mechanisms in which long standing electrical dysfunctions of perisylvian
neurons translates into bilateral neurological dysfunction" (p.38). The long-
term fluctuations in speech and language abilities in these patients are
attributed to the changing electro-chemical status of the brain when the
syndrome is active and when not. Previous authors in this volume where
EEG normalcy has been taken to be a condition for impairment in speech
and language functions in other neurological syndromes have noted similar
observations. The authors discuss clinical, neuropsychological and EEG data
from 5.3 years to 6.4 years of the child on several linguistic variables to
argue for their positions. The brief discussion on the long-term outcomes
of the child describes his severe reading a writing impairment.
Chapter 5 by Anna Chilosi, Chiara Pecini, Paola Cipriani, Daniela Brixxolava,
Paola Brovedani, Giovani Ferretti, Lueia Pfanner and Giovanni Ceoni is
titled, 'Cerebral Language Lateralization and Early Linguistic Development in
Children with Focal Brain Lesions' (49-63). Here the shift is from epilepsy
induced neurological conditions like LKS to young children with early
damage to left and right hemispheres. This paper discusses the longitudinal
studies conducted on such children with a focus on their focal lesion type
and early Lateralization of language in such children. The introduction
reviews such concepts like 'plasticity' and 'equipotentiality' in relation to
early hemispheric specialization of language (Lenneberg, 1967) and also
the importance of dichotic listening paradigm to investigate such issues
(Kimura, 1961, 1967). These are old and still unsolved problems in the
domain of brain -language discussion. As an empirical paper, the authors
provide information on subjects, MRI assessment results,
electrophysiological tests, and linguistic assessments along with the results
of dichotic listening. The results indicate a very early left hemisphere
specialization; significant linguistic deficits in children with left side focal
lesions compared to right side lesions (this has been a repeated
observation in the literature) and plasticity seen with the potential for
regeneration as significant language recoveries have been observed in such
children. The study points out towards the long-term language outcomes in
such children and their therapeutic management.
Chapter 6 is titled, 'Language Disorders Associated with Paroxysmal
Abnormalities During NREM Sleep After Very Early Brain Lesions' (65-85)
and is by Fabbro, Tavano, Cristofori and Borgatti. This has descriptions of
several case studies. The authors provide very detailed neurological,
medical and linguistic evaluations along with EEG and MRI results of
subjects whom they have followed since a long time. These children have
early lesions in cortical and subcortical areas and show different degrees of
language impairments. Based on their EEG findings the authors argue that
the presence of epileptic form abnormalities in NREM sleep is a key
predictive factor for cognitive/linguistic delay in children with early brain
lesions. This paper strongly consolidates the evidence that paroxysmal
abnormalities in the EEG of children with or without epileptic seizures are
strong clinical criteria. . This paper seems to argue that for any form of
language impairments there must be a neurological basis.
Chapter 7 titled 'Language and Phonological Awareness Abilities of
Children Treated for Posterior Fossa Tumor' (87-126) is by Murdoch,
Docking and Ward. The paper starts with an initial discussion of the role of
cerebellum in language development in general and language impairment
in specific. This is a hotly argues issue in neurolinguistics today. The
subjects of the study are children with posterior fossa which the authors say
accounts for over half of the brain tumors occurring in children (Cohen et
al, 1980). The paper investigates general language, high level language and
pre-literacy skills in children following treatment for posterior fossa tumor,
in the context of tumor types and their associated treatment effects.
Authors provide very detailed descriptions of each subject's performance on
a range of linguistic tasks to show individual differences in language
abilities. The paper concludes that high-level language impairment is
observed in children with posterior fossa tumors and they link the defects in
such cases to abnormalities in the cerebellum. The authors argue for the
children with posterior fossa tumors as a distinct clinical population with
specific linguistic cognitive impairments.
Chapter 8 by Borgatti, Tavano, and Fabbro is titled 'Language Development
in Children with Malformations"(127-148). Here the authors raise the
question of contributions of cerebellum in language development and
maintenances and how malfunctions localized to one or both cerebral
hemispheres may result in permanent receptive and expressive deficits. The
authors subscribe to the proposal that, although subtle and transient,
language disorders following acquired focal or large cerebral lesions point
towards involvement of the cerebellum in human language processing.
They discuss the nature of language impairment in theses patients with
different degrees of congenital cerebral malformations with extensive use
of various standardized test batteries to tap memory, visuo-spatial,
executive functions and language. The findings show noticeable variability
in the impairment of language in its specific modules according to the age
of the patient. However the paper does not claim a direct involvement of
cerebellum in language acquisition or impairment but speculates on it's
being fully functionally intact for smooth development of language and
other cognitive abilities.
Chapter 9 by Marien, Paquier, Engelborghs and De Dayn is titled 'Crossed
Aphasia in Children' (147-180). The chapter is a meta-analysis of several
primary published reports on acquired childhood aphasia and crossed
aphasia and also has a detailed analysis of selected cases of crossed
aphasia. The treatment is quite historical and includes reviews of many
nineteen-century studies on handedness, dexterity, hemispheric
specialization and aphasia in childhood (e.g. Cotrad, 1897; Sach and
Peterson, 1890 and Freud, 1897). Starting with the earliest articulated
notions of acquired childhood aphasia, the authors examine the nature of
crossed aphasia and other cases of childhood lesion language disorders
through 1900 to 1978 (p.150). There is a discussion of crossed aphasia in
sinistrals and dextrals. Crossed aphasia in dextrals has been very less
studies in the literature. In this connection the authors rightly observe
that "taken together with the extremely low incidence of CAD in children,
these considerations corroborate the view that lateralized cerebral
dominance for language represents an innate neurobiological condition"
(p.169).
Chapter 10 by Raquier, Maldegam, Dongen and Creton is
titled, 'Recognizable Spontaneous Characteristics in a Young Adult Twelve
Years after She Became Aphasic as a Child' (181-197). This case study is a
long-term follow up of an aphasic child focuses on several linguistic
variables that continue to manifest over year as typical aphasic deficits. The
analysis focuses largely on the pragmatic aspects of conversational speech
in terms of comparisons between acute phase and followed up phases. The
introduction reviews pertinent literature reveling the long term outcomes of
linguistic and non linguistic skills in children with aphasia acquired after
onset of language acquisition and states that aphasia symptoms persist till
late adulthood in very subtle forms (Paquier and van Dongen, 1996;
Watamori et al 1990). Very careful use of techniques in analysis of
spontaneous language samples by the authors makes the picture clear and
conclusions strong. The authors raise a question as per the utility of a
variable like MLU (Mean Length of Utterance) in measuring outcomes in
such cases arguing that, "MLU measurements performed at two different
points in time in the same patient do not show significant differences
despite a significant recovery, as the measurements are not indicative of the
intrinsic characteristics of semantic adequacy or morph syntactic complexity
and exactness" (p.191). This is a very important argument as far as
methodology of spontaneous language sample analysis is concerned. At the
end the authors offer a very useful appendix containing descriptions of
many technical terms used in spontaneous analysis of speech. Issues
argued in this paper are very important for clinicians and researchers
working with aphasic patients and trying quantifying language sample for
analysis.
Chapter 11 by Helena Lehelkova is tiled, 'Recovery from Aphasia After
Polytrauma in a Czech Child: What is Lost and What is Left"(199-229). This
is a case study of a Czech child with acquired aphasia and it describes the
aphasic symptoms in the child during her re-acquisition of language and
compares them with aphasic deficits in a group of selected Czech adults
with aphasia. The paper addresses the very important point of continuation
of aphasic symptoms over time and as age matures in an individual. The
author first discusses her own past work on aphasia and agrammatism in
Czech and then provides a very detailed neurological history of the patient
before coming to issues like, rehabilitation strategies undertaken to
improve communication skills. The author gives a comprehensive account
of the linguistic analysis of the patient's samples of spontaneous speech in
different time intervals. The samples that are compared are narrations and
conversations. Then the paper has the patient's performance on various
standardized tests of language with analysis of the wrong outputs. The
analysis of her performance after one year shows difference in deficits. In
her writing and drawing abilities there is variation and dissociations over
time. This is evident from the pictures of actual data sheets of the patients.
When the performance of this child is compared to an adult with aphasia
differences on several linguistic abilities become very clear. This provides
strong support to the author's claim about continuity of aphasic symptoms,
their similarities and dissimilarity over time at different age group.
The last chapter of the volume by Isabel Pavao Martins is titled 'Persistent
Acquired Childhood Aphasia' (231-251). The focus of the paper is on long-
term outcomes of children who have suffered brain damage early in life.
Authors discuss many of the aphasic symptoms, which either persist or
change qualitatively as well as quantitatively over time with analyses of
actual clinical data. The paper discusses clinical data of several aphasic
patients having different etiology and looks at those typical aphasic
symptoms that are still visible through tests even after the patient has
medically recovered. One most important point made by the authors is
about the age of onset of aphasia and its relation to future chance of
recovery and changing plasticity of the brain, which has effect on language
acquisition. The lesion related variables (site and nature, late epilepsy) but
not subject-related variables (age, gender, grade of education) are the main
facts responsible for the outcome of aphasic symptoms (p.244). A well
argued discussion section takes up the matter of better recovery of aphasia
in children than in adults. In the conclusion the authors note, "the
prognosis o acquired childhood aphasia secondary to static brain lesions is
generally favorable with a higher rate of recovery than in adults. Yet
language recovery is less complete than that reported after congenital
lesions, suggesting a reduced plasticity during the first years of life (p. 247).
CRITICAL EVALUATION
This is an excellent collection of papers on a very important theme of
language disorder and is going to be a valuable reference tool for students,
researchers and clinicians. The collections of articles have been done with
good editorial insight. They address diverse issues in neurogenic language
disorders in children involving very cutting edge research methods. There
are no typographical errors on any page and the book is very well
produced. The articles are fairly technical in nature and the volume is
addressed to professionals in the field. When majority of publications on
aphasia exclusively deal with adult forms of the disorder this volume fills
the gap taking up in depth studies on several kinds of neurogenic disorders
that are because of early injury to the brain. Authors have taken sufficient
care in clear descriptions of their methodologies that will help in replication
of the findings in other languages.
The volume contains paper addressing several pertinent theoretical and
methodological problems in the area of childhood neurogenic language
disorders. But some of the themes are very new and the results have to be
replicated in other languages to verify. Regarding the dependence of EEG
measures o identify epileptic aphasia one paper's authors note: "However,
the seizures and the EEG findings do not always correlate with the clinical
pictures and as such the EEG and the seizures may be only epiphenomena
that provided for the identification of a diverse group of language-EEG-
epileptic encephalopathy with diverse etiologies" (p.32). This is a
methodological question. But the papers are up to date research summaries
of the field. These papers are certainly helpful to know what are the big
theoretical questions in neurogenic child language disorder today.
REFERENCES
Cohen, M. E., P. K. Duffuer and C. K. Tebbi (1982). Brain tumors in children:
diagnosis and management. In Major Topics in Pediatric and Adolescent
Oncology (C. K. Tebbi, ed.), pp. 240-289. G. K. Hill Medical Publishing,
Boston.
Cotard, J. (1868). Etude Sur l'Atrophie Cerebrale. Faculté de Médécine, Paris.
Freud, S. (1897). Die Infantile Cerebrallmung. Alfred Holder, Wien.
Kimura, D. (1961). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli,
Canadian J Psychology, 15, 166-71.
Kimura,D .(1967). Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening .
Cortex, 3, 163-78.
Lenneberg, E.H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. John Wiley and
Sons. New York.
Paquier, P. and H. R. Van Dongen (1996). Review of research on the clinical
presentation of acquired childhood aphasia. Acta Neurol Scand, 93, 428-
436.
Sach, B. and F. Peterson (1890). A study of cerebral palsies of early life,
based upon analysis of one hundred and forty cases. J. NervMent Dis,
17,295-332.
Watamori, T. S, S. Ssannma and S.Ueda. (1990). Recovery and plasticity in
child-onset aphasics: ultimate outcome at adulthood, Aphasiology, 4,9-30
ABOUT THE REVIEWER
I am a lecturer in linguistics teaching clinical linguistics, psycholinguistics
and general linguistics to undergraduate and postgraduate students of
speech and hearing sciences. I have a PhD in linguistics from the University
of Delhi where I worked on phonological constraints in developmental
dyslexia. I also have M.Phil and MA degrees in linguistics from the same
university. My research interests are in linguistic theory and language
disorder, construction grammar, anaphora and morphology in aphasia.
-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-16-94
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list