16.3411, Software: WordNet 2.1 Java API
LINGUIST List
linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Tue Nov 29 19:59:16 UTC 2005
LINGUIST List: Vol-16-3411. Tue Nov 29 2005. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.
Subject: 16.3411, Software: WordNet 2.1 Java API
Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org)
Sheila Dooley, U of Arizona
Terry Langendoen, U of Arizona
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/
The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.
Editor for this issue: Maria Moreno-Rollins <maria at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
===========================Directory==============================
1)
Date: 23-Nov-2005
From: Philipp Cimiano < cimiano at aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de >
Subject: WordNet 2.1 Java API
-------------------------Message 1 ----------------------------------
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:56:04
From: Philipp Cimiano < cimiano at aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de >
Subject: WordNet 2.1 Java API
Dear all,
some time ago I posted a query asking for a decent WordNet Java API for
WordNet 2.1. I got the two answers below.
(Thanks to Gerard Peregrin and Umesh Patil)
>From Gerarde Peregrin:
Brandeis university distributes a Java version of Wordnet for Wordnet 2.0.
The Peregrin Foundation has adapted portions of it to use the recently
distributed Wordnet 2.1 dataset. It has also modestly adjusted the UI. It
is functional as a standalone JWordNet 2.1 or as an plugin package. It is
not yet a complete emulation of the C version of Wordnet nor a complete
re-development of the java source provided by Oliver Steele
[edu.brandeis.cs.steele.win.Browser. (Oliver Steele, steele at cs.brandeis.edu)].
>From Umesh Patil:
JWNL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/jwordnet/
This works for WN 2.0... I think it'll work with 2.1 as well but I am not sure.
Hope this also helps other people.
Best,
Philipp.
Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics
-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-16-3411
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list