16.2543, Diss: Historical Ling: Southern: 'The Wandering S ...'

[LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List: Vol-16-2543. Fri Sep 02 2005. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 16.2543, Diss: Historical Ling: Southern: 'The Wandering S ...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org) 
        Sheila Dooley, U of Arizona  
        Terry Langendoen, U of Arizona  

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Takako Matsui <tako at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.


===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 01-Sep-2005
From: Mark Southern < msouther at middlebury.edu >
Subject: The Wandering S: The problem of the s-mobile in Germanic and Indo-European 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 09:37:20
From: Mark Southern < msouther at middlebury.edu >
Subject: The Wandering S: The problem of the s-mobile in Germanic and Indo-European 
 


Institution: Princeton University 
Program: Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 1997 

Author: Mark R. V. Southern

Dissertation Title: The Wandering S: The problem of the s-mobile in Germanic
and Indo-European 

Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics
                     Morphology
                     Phonology

Subject Language(s): None ()

Language Family(ies): English
                      Germanic 
                      Latin Subgroup 
                      Romance 
                      Slavic Subgroup 


Dissertation Director(s):
Robert P. Ebert
Mark R. Hale
Brent H. Vine

Dissertation Abstract:

The movable s defies distributional predictability, within Indo-European
and later daughter-languages. Word-initial s-/zero alternations occur
across every IE dialect-group, apparently without conditioning or living
morphological function, nonetheless in certain languages ? chiefly Germanic
and Balto-Slavic ? exhibiting unexpected, regenerative durability. Enigmas
surrounding its morphophonemic origins have eluded satisfactory resolution.
Phonologically-conditioned sentential sandhi, involving *s-degemination
across word-boundaries by sound-rule, alongside metanalysis (n-orange),
does not adequately account for the data's nature and spread, even with the
help of analogical extension and hypercorrection (accretion/loss).

Chapters 1-2 deal with phonological-distribution issues; Chapter 3 explores
origin, character and function. IE s-movable's original and subsequent
nature is investigated for possible morphological explanations,
particularly as applied to root-structure constraints, to motivate and
classify the doublets' structurally anomalous behavior. Initial ±s shows
symmetry with root-final s-clusters; a system-gap is filled. S-loss is
probably the dominant dynamic, with complementary s-addition effects.

S-loss primacy is borne out by the secondary, successive continuation of
s-movable into Germanic. The chronological layering of Germanic evidence
relative to the Sound Shifts supplies an unusual vantage-point for
observing the process over time. Chapter 4 views s-mobile's later
development against the extraordinary preponderance of material
specifically from the Germanic dialects, morphologically analyzed
case-by-case. To questions of word-boundaries' non-salience, OHG evidence
(Celtic, Indic) for Auslaut-conditioned word-initial voicing alternants
(Nôtkêrs Anlautgesetz) suggests that the IE sentence-string was a
linguistically significant unit surprisingly late. Stabreim, binomial
pairs, phonetic and prosodic attributes, and expressive
(affectively-flavored) features contribute to the composite Germanic
picture. S-movable's survival and successive renewal are considered in the
light of evidence for Germanic's dialectal archaism within IE.

Chapters 5-6 discuss the detailed Germanic, Baltic, and pan-IE evidence
against relative chronology and phrasal-domain hierarchies
(word-boundaries' porosity), and against the cross-linguistically marked,
unstable phonetic character of sibilants, particularly their clusters.
Beside the IE's sibilant's phonological isolation are set S-clusters'
phonemic extraneousness, late acquisition, and ready simplifiability, in
child-language and aphasia. 




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-16-2543