17.1881, Diss: Computational Ling: Bonato: 'An Integrated Computational Appr...'

linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Mon Jun 26 14:29:22 UTC 2006


LINGUIST List: Vol-17-1881. Mon Jun 26 2006. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 17.1881, Diss: Computational Ling: Bonato: 'An Integrated Computational Appr...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org) 
        Laura Buszard-Welcher, U of California, Berkeley  
        Sheila Dooley, U of Arizona  
        Terry Langendoen, U of Arizona  

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Meredith Valant <meredith at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.


===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 22-Jun-2006
From: Roberto Bonato < roberto.bonato at gmail.com >
Subject: An Integrated Computational Approach to Binding Theory 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:25:34
From: Roberto Bonato < roberto.bonato at gmail.com >
Subject: An Integrated Computational Approach to Binding Theory 
 


Institution: University of Verona 
Program: Formal methods for Computer Science 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2006 

Author: Roberto Bonato

Dissertation Title: An Integrated Computational Approach to Binding Theory 

Dissertation URL:  http://www.fran.it/roby

Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics


Dissertation Director(s):
Denis Delfitto
Christian Retoré

Dissertation Abstract:

In this thesis I explore how different approaches to Binding Theory issued
from the last thirty years of linguistic enquiry may be effectively
integrated into a computational framework. My purpose is to enrich the
current framework of computational semantics in order to inductively
compute semantic representations of a sentence which incorporate the
principles of Binding Theory.

The original formulation of Binding Theory presents principles A, B and C
as syntactic conditions that indexed Determiner Phrases must fulfill in
order for the sentence in which they occur to be well-formed. Indexes are a
formal device halfway between syntax and semantics that was introduced to
encode coreferential relations between DPs in a sentence. They basically
act as filters that discard every structure whose indexing violates any of
A, B, or C principles. However, Determiner Phrases that occur in a
phrase-marker issued from generative parsing of a sentence do not come with
indexes associated. Principles A, B and C provide a procedure to verify
that a given indexing for a sentence is BT-compliant, but they are not
constructive: no effective procedure to associate correct indexing to DPs
in a sentence is provided. This is both a theoretically and a practically
challenging issue. How do human beings come to associate the correct
indexing (i.e. to establish the correct mutual denotational relationships)
to the DPs occurring in a sentence? And how can we devise a computational
procedure to mimic this process in order to obtain a semantic
representation for the sentence which encodes the additional information
provided by the constraints of Binding Theory?

In this thesis I tackle the problem of integrating in a computational
semantics framework the mechanisms needed to encode the principles of
Binding Theory into the semantic representations computed for a sentence.
Different interpretations that have been given to Binding Theory ask for
different implementations of such mechanisms. Eventually, I propose an
integrated approach that incorporates some of the basic features of the
approaches described into a framework which is both computationally
effective and linguistically well-grounded. We believe this to be the first
accomplished effort to integrate within a single coherent computational
framework some of the basic achievements and insights in Binding Theory
issued of the last 30 years of linguistics and formal semantics enquiry. 




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-17-1881	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list