17.3198, Qs: Identicalness Required within the Rhyme

LINGUIST Network linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Thu Nov 2 03:21:29 UTC 2006


LINGUIST List: Vol-17-3198. Wed Nov 01 2006. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 17.3198, Qs: Identicalness Required within the Rhyme

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Laura Welcher, Rosetta Project / Long Now Foundation  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows <kevin at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.


===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 30-Oct-2006
From: Dave Eberhard < dmeberhard at hotmail.com >
Subject: Identicalness Required within the Rhyme 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 22:19:25
From: Dave Eberhard < dmeberhard at hotmail.com >
Subject: Identicalness Required within the Rhyme 
 


In Mamainde, a Northern Nambiquara language of Brazil, a coronal (or
'default') coda will always get its place features from the nucleus, even
when feature sharing with the following onset would be expected. Nasal
codas also share the oral/nasal feature of the nucleus, (often producing
oral/nasal contour segments, or pre-oralized nasals)

This raises the slight possibility that these various and seemingly
independent instances of feature sharing between nucleus and coda might be
linked by the effects of a broader tendency for identicalness within the Rhyme

I am curious as to whether such a tendency has ever been documented in
other languages? Is anyone familiar with any languages where an
assimilation rule MUST reference the rhyme (not just the syllable or VC
adjacency)?

I am particularly interested in any possible markedness constraint, or
other broad phonological motivation, which pertains specifically to the
rhyme - holding between the nucleus and the coda, requiring them to be
identical in certain ways or share certain features in the output.

A summary of responses will be posted.

regards,
Dave Eberhard
S.I.L. field linguist
Brazil 

Linguistic Field(s): Phonology




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-17-3198	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list