17.3249, Qs: Token Frequency

LINGUIST Network linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Tue Nov 7 22:04:53 UTC 2006


LINGUIST List: Vol-17-3249. Tue Nov 07 2006. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 17.3249, Qs: Token Frequency

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Laura Welcher, Rosetta Project / Long Now Foundation  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows <kevin at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.


===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 02-Nov-2006
From: Wolfgang U. Dressler < wolfgang.dressler at univie.ac.at >
Subject: Token Frequency 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:03:50
From: Wolfgang U. Dressler < wolfgang.dressler at univie.ac.at >
Subject: Token Frequency 
 


Dear colleagues,

Could somebody help me locating the following reference?

In the nineties I wrote down from a discussion on the importance of token
frequency for the choice of basic vocabulary for early phases of foreign
language teaching the comment that words like ''tooth brush'' should be
taught early, although its token frequency in running texts is not very
high. Since I think that this can be used as an argument in other
discussions on the relevance of token frequency, I would be grateful for
any relevant reference.

Many thanks in advance
Wolfgang U. Dressler 

Linguistic Field(s): Applied Linguistics
                     General Linguistics




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-17-3249	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list