17.2923, Diss: Psycholinguistics: Mastropavlou: 'The Role of Phonological Sa...'

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List: Vol-17-2923. Fri Oct 06 2006. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 17.2923, Diss: Psycholinguistics: Mastropavlou: 'The Role of Phonological Sa...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Laura Welcher, Rosetta Project / Long Now Foundation  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Hannah Morales <hannah at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.


===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 06-Oct-2006
From: Maria Mastropavlou < mmastrop at enl.auth.gr >
Subject: The Role of Phonological Salience and Feature Interpretability in the Grammar of Typically Developing and Language Impaired Children 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:10:58
From: Maria Mastropavlou < mmastrop at enl.auth.gr >
Subject: The Role of Phonological Salience and Feature Interpretability in the Grammar of Typically Developing and Language Impaired Children 
 


Institution: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 
Program: School of English, Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2006 

Author: Maria Mastropavlou

Dissertation Title: The Role of Phonological Salience and Feature
Interpretability in the Grammar of Typically Developing and 
Language Impaired Children 

Linguistic Field(s): Psycholinguistics


Dissertation Director(s):
Anna Roussou
Arhonto Terzi
Ianthi Maria Tsimpli

Dissertation Abstract:

The aim of this thesis is to address two fundamental questions related to
the nature of specific language impairment: first, is the locus of the
problem in the representation of formal features and what is it that
renders them inaccessible to SLI children? And second, does language
development in SLI deviate from typical language acquisition in such a way
that we can talk about language impairment rather than language delay?

Three groups of children were recruited: an experimental group of ten
children with specific language impairment, aged between 4;2 and 5;9, and
two control groups selected based on chronological age (age-matched) and
language development (language-matched). The three groups were administered
a number of speech elicitation tests, aiming at the investigation of the
formal features of tense in the verbal domain, gender, case and number in
the nominal domain. Specifically, the effect of feature interpretability -
both LF and PF - on the children's performance was explored, while
performance differences between the SLI and the two control groups were
analysed with respect to the delay/deviance question. The results indicated
that LF uninterpretable features like tense and case cause greater
difficulties to SLI children than number, an LF interpretable feature.
Gender, a lexical/intrinsic feature, seems to be highly accessible to these
children, who did not exhibit any notable difficulties. Furthermore, PF
interpretability presented strong effects in the SLI children's performance
in tense marking, a pattern that was not observed in either of the two
control groups' results. 

These results suggest that LF interpretability determines the extent to
which formal features are accessible to SLI grammars, while PF
interpretability constitutes a means of compensation for an underlying
morphological deficit. Detailed analyses of the children's error patterns
indicated that SLI children have reduced skills of acquiring morphological
features and depend on information available on a semantic, lexical or
phonological level to a greater extent than unaffected children do.
Finally, it is claimed that specific language impairment impedes on the
acquisition of the morphological expression of formal features rather than
their abstract representation, while the different error patterns exhibited
by the language-impaired group compared to the two control groups indicate
deviant rather than delayed development. 




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-17-2923