17.3036, Diss: Morphology/Semantics/Syntax: Roehrs: 'The Morpho-Syntax of th...'

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List: Vol-17-3036. Tue Oct 17 2006. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 17.3036, Diss: Morphology/Semantics/Syntax: Roehrs: 'The Morpho-Syntax of th...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Laura Welcher, Rosetta Project / Long Now Foundation  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Hannah Morales <hannah at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.


===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 15-Oct-2006
From: Dorian Roehrs < roehrs at unt.edu >
Subject: The Morpho-Syntax of the Germanic Noun Phrase: Determiners MOVE into the Determiner Phrase 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:53:55
From: Dorian Roehrs < roehrs at unt.edu >
Subject: The Morpho-Syntax of the Germanic Noun Phrase: Determiners MOVE into the Determiner Phrase 
 


Institution: Indiana University, Bloomington 
Program: Department of Linguistics 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2006 

Author: Dorian Roehrs

Dissertation Title: The Morpho-Syntax of the Germanic Noun Phrase: Determiners
MOVE into the Determiner Phrase 

Dissertation URL:  http://www.forl.unt.edu/~roehrs/entire%20diss.pdf

Linguistic Field(s): Morphology
                     Semantics
                     Syntax

Language Family(ies): Germanic


Dissertation Director(s):
Zeljko Boskovic
Steven Franks
KarI Ellen Gade
Yoshihisa Kitagawa
Rex A Sprouse

Dissertation Abstract:

Clausal auxiliaries exhibit agreement and undergo movement. This
dissertation proposes that determiners are nominal auxiliaries. Also
showing agreement, demonstratives and (in-)definite articles are argued to
be base-generated in an article phrase (artP) above the theta domain of
nouns and below adjectives, and subsequently undergo movement to the
determiner phrase (DP) to value features on D. Three main arguments are
provided for this proposal. 

Chapter 2 discusses the syntactic distribution of the definite article in
the Scandinavian languages from a diachronic and synchronic point of view.
Interpreting adjectives as interveners for long-distance agreement between
DP and artP, languages are proposed to vary in the way they circumvent this
blocking effect. While Old Icelandic and Danish move the determiner to the
left periphery overtly, (common) Modern Icelandic does so covertly. After
demonstrating that the two determiners in Faroese, Norwegian, and Swedish
have different semantic import, I propose that these languages move one
part of their determiner to the left while stranding the other in situ.

Chapter 3 deals with the semantic distribution of the determiner.
Interpreting determiners as scope-bearing elements, I propose that, when
modifiers are in their scope, they are restrictive in interpretation, and,
when not, they are non-restrictive. Specifically, assuming movement of the
determiner, the restrictive reading of adjectives is explained by
interpreting the determiner in its derived position and the non-restrictive
reading follows from interpreting the determiner in its base-position.

Chapter 4 considers some morphological consequences of this proposal for
German. Concentrating on the weak/strong alternation of adjective endings,
I propose that the strong ending is licensed on the highest (appropriate)
element in the DP at the time the noun phrase is merged into the clause.
The weak ending is argued to be a default option. Exceptions to this
pattern follow from the assumption that certain determiners may move to the
DP at different times. This discussion is then extended to morphological
alternations in split NPs and pronominal DPs. 

More generally, making the assumption that determiners are nominal
auxiliaries that move to the left, these syntactic, semantic, and
morphological phenomena, although apparently unrelated, find a uniform account. 




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-17-3036