18.1034, Diss: Ling Theories/Syntax/Typology: Mycock: 'The Typology of Const...'

LINGUIST Network linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Thu Apr 5 22:09:39 UTC 2007


LINGUIST List: Vol-18-1034. Thu Apr 05 2007. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 18.1034, Diss: Ling Theories/Syntax/Typology: Mycock: 'The Typology of Const...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Laura Welcher, Rosetta Project  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Hunter Lockwood <hunter at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 04-Apr-2007
From: Louise Mycock < louise.mycock at manchester.ac.uk >
Subject: The Typology of Constituent Questions: A Lexical-Functional Grammar analysis of 'wh'-questions

*******************************************************************************
          Fund Drive FLASH: We still need $18,797 to end Fund Drive.
   If you have not donated, please visit http://linguistlist.org/donate.html
*******************************************************************************
Current Top 5 Schools in LL Grad School Challenge:
1. Stanford University   	                $1630
2. University of Massachusetts at Amherst 	$1497
3. University of Washington 	                $1209
4. University of California, Santa Barbara 	 $771
5. University of Toronto 	                 $760

To see the full list, go to: http://linguistlist.org/donation/fund-drive2007/allschools.cfm

******************************************************************************* 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 18:05:53
From: Louise Mycock < louise.mycock at manchester.ac.uk >
Subject:  The Typology of Constituent Questions: A Lexical-Functional Grammar analysis of 'wh'-questions 
 


Institution: University of Manchester 
Program: Department of Linguistics 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2006 

Author: Louise Mycock

Dissertation Title: The Typology of Constituent Questions: A Lexical-Functional 
Grammar analysis of 'wh'-questions 

Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories
                     Syntax
                     Typology

Subject Language(s): English (eng)
                     Hungarian (hun)
                     Japanese (jpn)
                     Malay (mly)


Dissertation Director(s):
Nigel Vincent

Dissertation Abstract:

In this thesis, I explore a non-derivational approach to the typology of
constituent ('wh') questions. Two principles are hypothesized to underlie
constituent question formation cross-linguistically: focusing of all
question words and the marking of interrogative scope. It is posited that
the requirements for focusing and scope marking can be met at the level of
syntax and/or prosody. These proposals are examined in relation to
constituent question formation in four case-study languages, each intended
to represent a type or types of constituent question formation strategy
identified in the literature: Japanese (in situ), Hungarian ('multiple
fronting', 'partial 'wh'-movement'), English ('simple fronting'), and
Malay ('bare scope marking').

Data show that focusing of question words, whether prosodic or syntactic,
has a part to play in each of these constituent question formation
strategies. There is also evidence of interrogative scope marking by
syntactic and/or prosodic means. It is revealed that interrogative scope is
delimited by a configuration involving one question phrase, distinguishable
from others in a multiple constituent question in terms of the way in which
it is focused. A new approach to 'scope marking' constructions is also
outlined, based on the proposal that clauses can be question phrases just
as other constituents can.

The proposed Lexical-Functional Grammar analysis of constituent questions
enables a typology of constituent question formation strategies to be
presented which provides a fresh perspective on the issue. Constituent
question formation strategies appear to exploit different means involving
distinct structural levels to achieve the same ends. This thesis shows that
by refining and fully exploiting the parallel architecture of
Lexical-Functional Grammar, generalizations can be made which provide new
insights into the formation of constituent questions cross-linguistically. 




-----------------------------------------------------------

This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $55,000. This money will go to help keep the 
List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.

See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Fund Drive 2007 
LINGUIST List Superhero Adventure for some Fund Drive fun!

http://linguistlist.org/donation/fund-drive2007/ 

There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!

You can donate right now using our secure credit card form.

Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later.

For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to donate by 
check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit:

http://linguistlist.org/donate.html

The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as such can 
receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 501(c) Non Profit 
organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These donations can be offset against 
your federal and sometimes your state tax return (U.S. tax payers only). For more 
information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact your financial advisor.

Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match any gift 
you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your contacting your human 
resources department and sending us a form that the EMU Foundation fills in and returns 
to your employer. This is generally a simple administrative procedure that doubles the 
value of your gift to LINGUIST, without costing you an extra penny. Please take a moment 
to check if your company operates such a program.

Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!


 

-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-18-1034	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list