18.2546, Diss: Syntax: Bahtchevanova: 'Mood, Modality, and Complementation: ...'

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List: Vol-18-2546. Thu Aug 30 2007. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 18.2546, Diss: Syntax: Bahtchevanova: 'Mood, Modality, and Complementation: ...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Hunter Lockwood <hunter at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 30-Aug-2007
From: Mariana Bahtchevanova < MarianaB at asu.edu >
Subject: Mood, Modality, and Complementation: A cross-linguistic study of the syntax and semantics of the left periphery

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:35:50
From: Mariana Bahtchevanova [MarianaB at asu.edu]
Subject: Mood, Modality, and Complementation: A cross-linguistic study of the syntax and semantics of the left periphery
E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=18-2546.html&submissionid=155163&topicid=14&msgnumber=1  


Institution: Arizona State University 
Program: Interdisciplinary Committee on Linguistics 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2007 

Author: Mariana Bahtchevanova

Dissertation Title: Mood, Modality, and Complementation: A cross-linguistic
study of the syntax and semantics of the left periphery 

Linguistic Field(s): Syntax


Dissertation Director(s):
Elly van Gelderen

Dissertation Abstract:

Sentential complementation, a common syntactic mechanism of clausal
integration, occurs in all languages, but the level of integration of
different embedded structures varies not only cross-linguistically but also
within the same language.This dissertation represents a cross-linguistic
study of the syntactic realization of mood and modality in clausal
complementation in the light of recent generative proposals dealing with
the fine structure of the discourse and grammatical domains. The study also
builds on several semantic proposals of mood following the framework of
dynamic semantics.

It is argued that different levels of integration correspond to different
structures of the left periphery: declarative complements, which represent
the most independent type, are usually headed by a high complementizer
whereas modal complements, which are analyzed as non-assertive propositions
with anaphoric tense, are selected by a low modal complementizer.
Cross-linguistically, mood can be overtly encoded not only in the
complementizer layer but also in the functional layer, or in both.
 
The dissertation also examines the relationship between the semantics of
the matrix predicate and the structure of the embedded complements
presenting evidence from Germanic, Romance, Slavic, and Balkan languages.
It claims that while the meaning of the selecting predicate determines the
possible models of evaluation of the status of the embedded proposition,
the syntax of the complement structure overtly encodes this model by means
of modal complementizers, modal verbs, or modal inflection.

The last part provides a solution to the puzzle of modal complementation in
Bulgarian. It is argued that despite the large array of contexts where
finite modal clauses occur, the unifying semantic feature is their
non-assertiveness, which is syntactically realized as a modal particle
situated in the lowest section of the discourse domain. This hybrid
particle represents a transition step between the functional and discourse
layers, because it forms a complex with the functional domain and at the
same type performs the typical functions of complementizers. The modal
particle is analyzed as the lowest complementizer, which cannot license
deictic tense and thus selects only non-assertive complements. 





-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-18-2546