18.806, Books: Language Acquisition/Pragmatics: Minh
LINGUIST Network
linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Thu Mar 15 18:47:18 UTC 2007
LINGUIST List: Vol-18-806. Thu Mar 15 2007. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.
Subject: 18.806, Books: Language Acquisition/Pragmatics: Minh
Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Reviews: Laura Welcher, Rosetta Project
<reviews at linguistlist.org>
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/
The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University,
and donations from subscribers and publishers.
Editor for this issue: Hannah Morales <hannah at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
Links to the websites of all LINGUIST's supporting publishers
are available at the end of this issue.
===========================Directory==============================
1)
Date: 14-Mar-2007
From: Ulrich Lueders < lincom.europa at t-online.de >
Subject: Learning to Give and Respond to Peer-Feedback in the L2: Minh
-------------------------Message 1 ----------------------------------
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:41:36
From: Ulrich Lueders < lincom.europa at t-online.de >
Subject: Learning to Give and Respond to Peer-Feedback in the L2: Minh
Title: Learning to Give and Respond to Peer-Feedback in the L2
Subtitle: The case of EFL criticisms and responses to criticism
Series Title: LINCOM Studies in Language Acquisition 21
Publication Year: 2007
Publisher: Lincom GmbH
http://www.lincom.eu
Author: Nguyen Thi Thuy Minh
Paperback: ISBN: 9783895867675 Pages: 363 Price: Europe EURO 72.00
Abstract:
Interlanguage pragmatics research has contributed a great deal to our
understanding of L2 pragmatic use but less to our understanding of L2
pragmatic development, although developmental issues are also its primary
research goal. Additionally, previous studies have been confined to a
rather small set of speech acts, under-researching such face-damaging acts
as criticizing and responding to criticism even though these may be more
challenging for L2 learners.
The study reported in this book examines pragmatic development in the use
of criticizing and responding to criticism by a group of Vietnamese EFL
learners with a view to shedding light on the pragmatic properties of these
speech acts. IL data were collected from 12 high beginners, 12 intermediate
learners, and 12 advanced learners, via a written questionnaire and a
conversation elicitation task, and analyzed with reference to L1 and L2
baseline data collected from 12 Vietnamese and 12 Australian NSs via the
same methods. Metapragmatic data were collected via retrospective interview.
The following findings have been discussed in the book:
1. Criticizing and responding to criticism are complex speech acts, which
should be described as speech act sets rather than single speech acts and
which need to be frequently mitigated in order to maintain harmony between
interlocutors. The complexity of these speech acts poses a lot of
difficulty to learners, including those with a high level of grammatical
competence.
2. While adult learners enjoy a fair amount of universal pragmatic
knowledge for free (Kasper, 1992), learning new pragmatic knowledge is
still a major task for them when acquiring L2 pragmatics. So is the task of
developing a control over attention to this knowledge.
3. Learning environments may play a more important role than we would have
expected. EFL learning environments do not seem to facilitate L2 pragmatic
development, especially in the case of challenging tasks such as
criticizing and responding to criticism, given the learners' little
exposure to the target norms. Classroom discourse, which is biased towards
unequal social role relationships (Ellis, 1992; Kasper, 1997), tends to
contribute to making the task of learning L2 pragmatics almost impossible
in the EFL context.
4. The acquisitional order of modifiers seems to depend on their structural
complexity and the degree of cognitive demand involved in producing them as
claimed by Meisel et al (1981). Learners seem to attend to external
modifiers more than to internal modifiers as the latter contribute only
minimal propositional meaning to the speech acts. They also seem to have
less difficulty with external modifiers as these are often realized in
separate constituents, not as an integral part of the speech acts, and thus
do not increase the structural complexity of the speech acts (Hassal, 2001).
5. The relationship between proficiency and transfer may not be a linear
one. Also, as hypothesized by Kellerman (1983), learners play an active
role in transferring: they do have their own perceptions of what is
transferable and what is non-transferable and act accordingly.
Linguistic Field(s): Language Acquisition
Pragmatics
Written In: English (eng)
See this book announcement on our website:
http://linguistlist.org/get-book.html?BookID=24499
MAJOR SUPPORTERS
Cascadilla Press
http://www.cascadilla.com/
Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd
http://www.continuumbooks.com
Edinburgh University Press
http://www.eup.ed.ac.uk/
Georgetown University Press
http://www.press.georgetown.edu
Hodder Arnold
http://www.hoddereducation.co.uk
John Benjamins
http://www.benjamins.com/
Lincom GmbH
http://www.lincom.eu
Mouton de Gruyter
http://www.mouton-publishers.com
Multilingual Matters
http://www.multilingual-matters.com/
Oxford University Press
http://www.oup.com/us
Pagijong Press
http://pjbook.com
Palgrave Macmillan
http://www.palgrave.com
Peter Lang AG
http://www.peterlang.com
Rodopi
http://www.rodopi.nl/
Springer
http://www.springer.com
OTHER SUPPORTING PUBLISHERS
CSLI Publications
http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/
International Pragmatics Assoc.
http://www.ipra.be
Linguistic Assoc. of Finland
http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/sky/
Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke - LOT
http://www.lotpublications.nl/
St. Jerome Publishing Ltd.
http://www.stjerome.co.uk
-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-18-806
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list