20.2414, Diss: Psycholing/Semantics: Cardini: 'Language and Thought: A...'

[linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG]

LINGUIST List: Vol-20-2414. Mon Jul 06 2009. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 20.2414, Diss: Psycholing/Semantics: Cardini: 'Language and Thought: A...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny <di at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 05-Jul-2009
From: Filippo-Enrico Cardini < f_cardini_2000 at hotmail.com >
Subject: Language and Thought: A linguistic and non-linguistic comparison between English and Italian in the domain of manner of motion
 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:34:32
From: Filippo-Enrico Cardini [f_cardini_2000 at hotmail.com]
Subject: Language and Thought: A linguistic and non-linguistic comparison between English and Italian in the domain of manner of motion

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=20-2414.html&submissionid=222827&topicid=14&msgnumber=1
  


Institution: Lancaster University 
Program: Ph.D. Program in Linguistics - Testing Linguistic Relativity 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2009 

Author: Filippo-Enrico Cardini

Dissertation Title: Language and Thought: A linguistic and non-linguistic
comparison between English and Italian in the domain of
manner of motion 

Linguistic Field(s): Psycholinguistics
                     Semantics

Subject Language(s): English (eng)
                     Italian (ita)


Dissertation Director(s):
Paul Chilton

Dissertation Abstract:

This doctoral thesis addresses the issue of linguistic relativity, the
theory postulating the existence of non-linguistic cognitive differences
between speakers of contrasting languages. This hypothesis is tested in the
present thesis by means of a comparative study between English and Italian
speakers with respect to the conceptual domain of manner of motion. The
study, thus, provides some additional contribution to the current research
on motion conceptualisation, both in theoretical and in empirical terms. On
the theoretical side, one should highlight in particular the creation of
some semantic criteria for determining what should (and should not) count
as a 'manner of motion verb'. On the empirical side, the thesis describes
an investigation into linguistic relativity which has produced a large
amount of data through linguistic and psycholinguistic experiments
conducted on native speakers, as well as through a dictionary-based lexical
survey of English and Italian manner of motion verbs. The investigation
into the relativity hypothesis has first sought to establish whether and to
what degree the speakers of the two languages examined differ in
availability and use of manner of motion verbs. In doing this, valuable
information has been gathered especially with respect to Italian, for which
little experimental data were available before the present study. In line
with predictions based on Talmy's (1985, 1991) classification of language
types, English and Italian speakers have been found to differ significantly
in the variety and frequency of use of manner of motion verbs in their
colloquial speech (with English speakers displaying a much wider repertoire
and a much more frequent mention of such verbs than Italian speakers).
However, when tested on a non-linguistic cognitive task aimed at measuring
the degree of visual attention paid to manners of motion, the difference
between the two linguistic groups was not significant. Consequently, the
study has provided negative evidence for linguistic relativity. 




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-20-2414