20.2497, Diss: Semantics/Syntax: Sugita: 'Japanese -TE IRU and -TE ARU: The...'

linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Tue Jul 14 14:30:01 UTC 2009


LINGUIST List: Vol-20-2497. Tue Jul 14 2009. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 20.2497, Diss: Semantics/Syntax: Sugita: 'Japanese -TE IRU and -TE ARU: The...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny <di at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 13-Jul-2009
From: Mamori Sugita < mamori.sugita at gmail.com >
Subject: Japanese -TE IRU and -TE ARU: The aspectual implications of the stage-level and individual-level distinction
 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:28:18
From: Mamori Sugita [mamori.sugita at gmail.com]
Subject: Japanese -TE IRU and -TE ARU: The aspectual implications of the stage-level and individual-level distinction

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=20-2497.html&submissionid=223867&topicid=14&msgnumber=1
  


Institution: City University of New York 
Program: Linguistics Program 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2009 

Author: Mamori Sugita

Dissertation Title: Japanese -TE IRU and -TE ARU: The aspectual implications of 
the stage-level and individual-level distinction 

Linguistic Field(s): Semantics
                     Syntax

Subject Language(s): Japanese (jpn)


Dissertation Director(s):
William McClure
Robert Fiengo
Marcel den Dikken

Dissertation Abstract:

This dissertation investigates semantic and syntactic properties of the
forms -te iru and -te aru in Japanese, as well as pragmatic effects of
statements with these forms. 

With an activity verb in the -te iru form, progressive, experiential, and
habitual readings are available. With an achievement verb in the -te iru
form, perfective, experiential, and habitual readings are available. I
address specifically the difference between perfective and experiential
readings. After reviewing the literature, where it seems that the
distinction is not clear, I give a series of empirical tests and argue that
experiential sentences exhibit properties of individual-level predicates,
while perfective (as well as progressive) sentences exhibit properties of
stage-level predicates.

There are two types of -te aru sentences, intransitivizing and
non-intransitivizing -te aru, both of which have been claimed to yield
perfective readings. However, I argue that all -te aru sentences are
experiential and exhibit properties that parallel individual-level predicates. 

Formally, I propose that progressive and perfective -te iru are represented
as sets of events with a requirement that the event be realized. In
contrast, I propose that experiential -te iru and -te aru are represented
as sets of individuals with a requirement that the event be realized. The
relative scope difference of the event and individual variables in the
semantic representation reflects the stage-level and individual-level
distinction. Progressive and perfective -te iru denote properties of
events, while experiential -te iru and -te aru denote properties of
individuals. 

The stage-level/individual-level distinction is also reflected in the
proposed syntax. Progressive and perfective -te iru sentences have raising
structures, while experiential -te iru and -te aru sentences have control
structures. The scope of the event and individual arguments in the
semantics of -te iru and -te aru is reflected in the position of their
subjects in syntax.  

Lastly, I argue that habitual -te iru sentences parallel experiential -te
iru sentences in that they also exhibit properties of individual-level
predicates. 




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-20-2497	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list