20.2497, Diss: Semantics/Syntax: Sugita: 'Japanese -TE IRU and -TE ARU: The...'
linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Tue Jul 14 14:30:01 UTC 2009
LINGUIST List: Vol-20-2497. Tue Jul 14 2009. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.
Subject: 20.2497, Diss: Semantics/Syntax: Sugita: 'Japanese -TE IRU and -TE ARU: The...'
Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah
<reviews at linguistlist.org>
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/
The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University,
and donations from subscribers and publishers.
Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny <di at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
===========================Directory==============================
1)
Date: 13-Jul-2009
From: Mamori Sugita < mamori.sugita at gmail.com >
Subject: Japanese -TE IRU and -TE ARU: The aspectual implications of the stage-level and individual-level distinction
-------------------------Message 1 ----------------------------------
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:28:18
From: Mamori Sugita [mamori.sugita at gmail.com]
Subject: Japanese -TE IRU and -TE ARU: The aspectual implications of the stage-level and individual-level distinction
E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=20-2497.html&submissionid=223867&topicid=14&msgnumber=1
Institution: City University of New York
Program: Linguistics Program
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2009
Author: Mamori Sugita
Dissertation Title: Japanese -TE IRU and -TE ARU: The aspectual implications of
the stage-level and individual-level distinction
Linguistic Field(s): Semantics
Syntax
Subject Language(s): Japanese (jpn)
Dissertation Director(s):
William McClure
Robert Fiengo
Marcel den Dikken
Dissertation Abstract:
This dissertation investigates semantic and syntactic properties of the
forms -te iru and -te aru in Japanese, as well as pragmatic effects of
statements with these forms.
With an activity verb in the -te iru form, progressive, experiential, and
habitual readings are available. With an achievement verb in the -te iru
form, perfective, experiential, and habitual readings are available. I
address specifically the difference between perfective and experiential
readings. After reviewing the literature, where it seems that the
distinction is not clear, I give a series of empirical tests and argue that
experiential sentences exhibit properties of individual-level predicates,
while perfective (as well as progressive) sentences exhibit properties of
stage-level predicates.
There are two types of -te aru sentences, intransitivizing and
non-intransitivizing -te aru, both of which have been claimed to yield
perfective readings. However, I argue that all -te aru sentences are
experiential and exhibit properties that parallel individual-level predicates.
Formally, I propose that progressive and perfective -te iru are represented
as sets of events with a requirement that the event be realized. In
contrast, I propose that experiential -te iru and -te aru are represented
as sets of individuals with a requirement that the event be realized. The
relative scope difference of the event and individual variables in the
semantic representation reflects the stage-level and individual-level
distinction. Progressive and perfective -te iru denote properties of
events, while experiential -te iru and -te aru denote properties of
individuals.
The stage-level/individual-level distinction is also reflected in the
proposed syntax. Progressive and perfective -te iru sentences have raising
structures, while experiential -te iru and -te aru sentences have control
structures. The scope of the event and individual arguments in the
semantics of -te iru and -te aru is reflected in the position of their
subjects in syntax.
Lastly, I argue that habitual -te iru sentences parallel experiential -te
iru sentences in that they also exhibit properties of individual-level
predicates.
-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-20-2497
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list