20.2206, Qs: Strunk and White Research
linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Wed Jun 17 18:23:06 UTC 2009
LINGUIST List: Vol-20-2206. Wed Jun 17 2009. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.
Subject: 20.2206, Qs: Strunk and White Research
Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah
<reviews at linguistlist.org>
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/
The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University,
and donations from subscribers and publishers.
Editor for this issue: Pamela Dixon <pamela at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
===========================Directory==============================
1)
Date: 17-Jun-2009
From: Geoff Pullum < gpullum at ling.ed.ac.uk >
Subject: Strunk and White Research
-------------------------Message 1 ----------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:19:33
From: Geoff Pullum [gpullum at ling.ed.ac.uk]
Subject: Strunk and White Research
E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=20-2206.html&submissionid=221008&topicid=8&msgnumber=1
A small query about ''The Elements of Style'' for anyone who owns the
second (1972) edition of the White revision. The paragraph railing against
the use of ''hopefully'' as a modal adjunct (rather than a manner adjunct)
is present in the 3rd (1979) and future editions, but not there in the 1959
first edition. Is it there in the 2nd (1972) edition, published during the
period (roughly 1965-1975) when the campaign to vilify the adverb in
question was at its height? The paragraph on ''hopefully'' will be found,
if it is there, in chapter IV, ''Words and Expressions Commonly Misused'',
just after the entry disapproving ''He is a man who'' (!) and just before
the entry attacking clause-initial ''However'' (!!). Email response to me
if you can answer, please. I will then post the answer on the LINGUIST
List to relieve others of the chore of responding.
Linguistic Field(s): Syntax
-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-20-2206
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list