20.3620, Diss: Historical Ling/Text/Corpus Ling: Copple: 'A Diachronic Study...'

linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Tue Oct 27 15:31:26 UTC 2009


LINGUIST List: Vol-20-3620. Tue Oct 27 2009. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 20.3620, Diss: Historical Ling/Text/Corpus Ling: Copple: 'A Diachronic Study...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Eric Raimy, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny <di at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 25-Oct-2009
From: Mary Copple < mcopple at ksu.edu >
Subject: A Diachronic Study of the Spanish Perfect(ive): Tracking the constraints on a grammaticalizing construction
 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:29:31
From: Mary Copple [mcopple at ksu.edu]
Subject: A Diachronic Study of the Spanish Perfect(ive): Tracking the constraints on a grammaticalizing construction

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=20-3620.html&submissionid=235114&topicid=14&msgnumber=1
  


Institution: University of New Mexico 
Program: Spanish 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2009 

Author: Mary T Copple

Dissertation Title: A Diachronic Study of the Spanish Perfect(ive): Tracking
the constraints on a grammaticalizing construction 

Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics
                     Text/Corpus Linguistics

Subject Language(s): Spanish (spa)


Dissertation Director(s):
Rena Torres Cacoullos

Dissertation Abstract:

The grammaticalization of perfects along the path from resultative to
perfective has been much researched (Harris 1982, Bybee et al. 1994);
however, debate continues about the inclusion of Stage II (continuative
perfects) and how extension to perfective contexts occurs (Squartini and
Bertinetto 1995, 2000).  In some varieties of contemporary Peninsular
Spanish, the Present Perfect (PP) competes with the Preterit for use in
perfective contexts, and now exhibits advanced grammaticalization as it is
well established in Hodiernal temporal reference (Schwenter 1994b, Serrano
1994).  Furthermore, comparision of variation patterns in Peninsular and
Mexican Spanish suggests that indeterminate temporal reference (perfective,
but not temporally specified) is the context most susceptible to further
perfective grammaticalization (Schwenter and Torres Cacoullos 2008).  This
study examines PP grammaticalization from a diachronic, variationist
perspective.  PP and Preterit data from three different centuries (15th,
17th, and 19th) are drawn from dramatic texts in order to define the
contexts of use for the two competing forms and the linguistic factors that
constrained the variation.  

In the 15th century, the PP is characterized as a resultative/emerging
perfect.  At this early stage, in Immediately Preceding temporal reference
contexts the PP has developed a 'hot news' function, while extension to
Irrelevant and Indeterminate temporal reference contexts is concentrated in
semantic classes associated with resultative use.  In the 17th century, the
PP truly becomes established as a perfect, extending to all semantic verb
classes in Irrelevant temporal reference contexts, with an accompanying
rise in frequency relative to the Preterit.  The PP also extends its use in
Indeterminate contexts, and those contexts are selected as favorable in the
Variable Rule Analysis for the 17th century.  In the 19th century,
Hodiernal contexts favor selection of the PP as the form continues its
extension into perfective and temporally specified contexts.  

It is concluded that the non-specified temporal reference contexts play a
special role in the PP's grammaticalization: the Irrelevant PP function
helps to solidify the event focus of the 'hot news' perfect, while the
Indeterminate function relaxes the restrictions of current relevance by
strengthening the PP's association with perfectivity. 




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-20-3620	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list