21.202, Qs: Adjectival Neutralisation Study

[linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG]

LINGUIST List: Vol-21-202. Wed Jan 13 2010. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 21.202, Qs: Adjectival Neutralisation Study

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Eric Raimy, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Elyssa Winzeler <elyssa at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 13-Jan-2010
From: Maarten De Backer < M.DeBacker at UGent.be >
Subject: Adjectival Neutralisation Study
 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:19:48
From: Maarten De Backer [M.DeBacker at UGent.be]
Subject: Adjectival Neutralisation Study

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=21-202.html&submissionid=2373614&topicid=8&msgnumber=1
  


Dear colleagues,

I am currently investigating the phenomenon of neutralisation in German
with respect to adjectival oppositions (lang/kurz, hoch/niedrig,
gross/klein,breit/schmal, dick/dünn, ...). 

Neutralisation typically occurs in the following contexts:

- Measure Phrases: 
Das Kind ist drei Monate alt (the child is three months old)

- Expressions of Comparison: 
A ist genauso/ebenso (Adj) wie B (A is as Adj as B)
A und B sind gleich (Adj) (A and B are equally Adj)
A ist (nicht) so Adj wie B (A is as Adj as B)

- Direct Questions:
Wie (Adj) ist X? (How Adj is X?)

- Indirect Questions:
Ich frage mich, wie (Adj) X ist (I wonder how Adj X is)

- Nominalizations:
Grösse (height,size)
Alter (age)
...

Interestingly, a corpus study bears out that these types of constructions
are not always equally ''neutral'' as is predicted by many theoretical
studies on this topic.

However, another interesting thing is that if the opposition is
neutralised, it is always the so-called ''unmarked'' adjective that can be
used with a neutral meaning (alt, gross, hoch, breit,...), at least as far
as the West-European languages are concerned.

My question is whether there are languages in the world that use a third
term that is (formally) different from the opposing adjectives in order to
convey the neutral meaning. In other words, whether there are languages
where a third term is used in contexts of neutralisation (so the relation
between the terms would be comparable to the lexical relation
brother/sister//sibling).

I would be very grateful for any kind of information or resource.

with kind regards,

Maarten De Backer
Ghent University
Faculty of Arts and Philosophy
Department of German and General Linguistics

M.DeBacker at UGent.be 

Linguistic Field(s): Morphology
                     Syntax
                     Typology




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-21-202