21.2719, Sum: /f/ to /theta/ Sound Changes

Fri Jun 25 22:04:04 UTC 2010

LINGUIST List: Vol-21-2719. Fri Jun 25 2010. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 21.2719, Sum: /f/ to /theta/ Sound Changes

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Eric Raimy, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Danielle St. Jean <danielle at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 25-Jun-2010
From: Ryan Bennett < rbennett at ucsc.edu >
Subject: /f/ to /theta/ Sound Changes

-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:02:20
From: Ryan Bennett [rbennett at ucsc.edu]
Subject: /f/ to /theta/ Sound Changes

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=21-2719.html&submissionid=2639314&topicid=10&msgnumber=1

Editor's note: This issue contains non-ISO-8859-1 characters.
To view the correct characters, go to http://linguistlist.org/issues/21/21-2719.html.

Query for this summary posted in LINGUIST Issue: 21.920                                                                                                                                                

Some months ago I posted a query on The LINGUIST List asking for 
any attested instances of a historical /f/ > /theta/ change, or for any 
dialect variation between /f/ and /theta/ in which /f/ has become /theta/ 
in the innovative dialect.

Many thanks to the following people for responding to my query:

James Brookes
Ronald Cosper
Inge Genee
Lauren Hall-Lew
Patrick Honeybone
Mark Jones
Martin Kümmel
Kelly Lynne Maynard
Daniela Müller
Pamela Munro
Boyan Nikolaev
Emerson Odango
Mikael Parkvall
Joseph Salmons
Gary Taylor
Rémy Viredaz

I also have responded to each of these people individually. I apologize 
to them (and all other interested folks) for not posting this summary 
sooner.

The responses were of four types, and are grouped below.
----------
(I) Attested /f/ > /theta/ changes:

Mikael Parkvall and Emerson Odango noted that in Pulo-Annan 
(Chuukic), Proto-Micronesian *f became /ð/ (orthographic <d>), despite 
becoming /f/ in all other Chuukic languages. 

The motivation for this change is unclear, though it may have been 
influenced by areal contact with Palauan, which has /ð/. The Chuukic 
language Ulithian also has /ð/, but as a regular reflex of Proto-
Micronesian *d.

Joseph Salmons and Gary Taylor also pointed out an example of a 
conditioned /f/ > /theta/ change: Gothic reflexes of early Germanic /fl-/ 
often show up as /theta+l/.

References:
(a) Schiko Oda's thesis "The Syntax of Pulo Annan"

(b) pp. 4-5 of Bender, Byron, Ward Goodenough, Frederick Jackson, 
Jeffrey Marck, Kenneth Rehg, Ho-min Sohn, Stephen Trussel & Judith 
Wang (2003): Proto-Micronesian Reconstructions 1. Oceanic 
Linguistics 42 (1), pp 1-110.

(c) Joseph Salmons and Gregory Iverson (1993) "Gothic /þl-/ ~ /fl-/ 
Variation as Lexical Diffusion." Diachronica 10.87-96. 

(d) Jones, Mark J. (2002). "More on the instability of interdental 
fricatives." Word 53(1): 1-8.
----------
(II) Reconstructed (but unattested) /f/ > /theta/ changes:

James Brookes, citing Stuart-Smith (2004), suggested that Proto-Indo-
European /dh/ may have passed through /f/ on its way to becoming 
Latin /d/. I repeat the argument more or less verbatim:

"...in Latin and Sabellian the PIE so-called voiced aspirated stop /dh/ 
went through a lenition stage in medial positions, /dh/ > /d/ > /theta/ > 
/f/.  In Sabellian, the lenition remained, so /f/ is found in words like 
mefiaí '(in the) middle' < PIE *medh-yos.

In Latin, /f/ is not the actual medial reflex of PIE /dh/, but rather /d/, so 
the lexical equivalent of Sab. mefiaí is Lat. medius. Smith therefore 
supposes that in Latin /f/ underwent some kind of re-fortition to /d/ in 
the medial position; the only way to account for fortition is through a 
stepwise reversal, which should naturally involve a /theta/ stage."

References:
(a) Jane Stuart-Smith (2004). "Phonetics and philology: sound change 
in Italic." Oxford University Press.
----------
(III) Lexically isolated /f/ > /theta/ changes

In his own extensive diachronic work, Martin Kümmel found only one 
potential case of a /v/ > /ð/ change, localized to the Eastern Iranian 
Pamir languages of the Shughni group (including Yazghulami) and 
neighbouring Sanglichi. This was a conditioned change, with "voiced /v/ 
[becoming] the corresponding dental fricative before /m/ from /n/" in a 
single form.

The word for 'sleep,' which "originally must have had /fn/ voiced to 
/vn/," ultimately reaching /ðm/, with "the labial feature...gone over to the 
nasal." The diachronic trajectory of this change might then have been 
/fn/ > /vn/ (> /vm/) > /ðm/. Martin speculated that this final stage may 
have been dissimilatory in nature.

Martin also notes that (unsurprisingly) /theta/ > /f/ changes were 
widespread in his survey (p.193f).

Daniela Müller found a single case of /f/ > /th/ in a dialect of Occitan: 
Latin /febrem/ 'fever' is realized as /ther/. However, this may not 
represent a true /f/ > /th/ change, but rather a mediated /f/ > ... > /fth/ > 
/th/ change. As Daniela writes:

"...it is an /fj/-cluster that developed into the interdental fricative, 
because of the diphthongisation of the Latin short /e/. The palatal glide 
in stop+palatal onset clusters sometimes develops into /th/ in those 
dialects, so that in the word for 'fever,' the evolution /fjer/ > /fther/ > 
/ther/ is more likely. (Only the /f/ is phonemic in general Occitan.)"

References:
(a) p.220 of M. J. Kümmel, Konsonantenwandel: Bausteine zu einer 
Typologie des Lautwandels und ihre Konsequenzen für die 
vergleichende Rekonstruktion. Wiesbaden: Reichert 2007.

(b) Point 9 of the Atlas Linguistique du Limousin et de l'Auvergne (La 
Chapelle-Marcousse (Puy-de-Dôme))
----------
(IV) /f/ ~ /theta/ dialect variation

Kelly Lynne Maynard reported that some sub-dialects of Albanian show 
conditioned /f/ ~ /th/ variation. The varieties in question are two North 
Gheg dialects (Borgo Erizzo/Arbanasi and Peshter).

In Borgo Erizzo/Arbanasi, f > ? / _ t, e.g. [prift] > [pri?t] 'priest'. In 
Peshter, Standard Albanian /ferra/ 'thorny bush' is realized as /therra/. 
This change is not due to a general ban on /fe/ sequences in Peshter: 
cf. Peshter /i fell/ vs. Standard Albanian /thell/ 'deep.'

All Albanian dialects have phonemic /f v ? ð/, so these changes are 
(potentially) neutralizing. Again, Kelly notes that the opposite shift (/th/ 
> /f/) is quite common in Albanian dialects, as the above forms for 
'deep' illustrate.

Finally, Rémy Viredaz suggested that Tsakonian Greek underwent a 
conditioned /f/ > /th/ change. Rémy writes that "a change of /f/ to /theta/ 
(sometimes /khi/) [occurred] in Tsakonian, however only before syllabic 
and asyllabic /i/ (from Ancient Greek /iota/ as well as /eta/, though not 
from /ypsilon/, which is known to have merged with /i/ only later, and 
not before /e/); this change does not affect recent loans from 
mainstream Modern Greek."

Rémy points out that this change is likely linked to palatalization, as 
"Tsakonian also changes the sequences /ti/ and /pi/ to /ki/ (so written, 
but obviously with palatalized /k/; /k/ is palatalized before /e i/ in 
modern Standard Greek)."

He also observes that this potential /f/ > /theta/ change is not the result 
of a pull-chain or 'slot-filling' shift: though "Ancient Greek /theta/ shifted 
to /s/ already in Antiquity (Laconian), Tsakonian nevertheless 
possesses /theta/, e.g. /tha/ (future tense) or /tha'ssa/ (mainstream 
Greek /tha'lassa/, 'sea')," independently of the /f/ > /th/ change.

References:
(a) Weigand, Gustav. (1911) Der Gegische dialect von Borgo Erizzo 
bei Zara in Dalmatien. 

(b) Tagliavini, Carlo. (1937) L'albanese di dalmazia contributi alla 
conoscenza del dialetto Ghego di Borgo Erizzo presso Zara.

(c) p.104 of Latif Mulaku and Medhi Bardhi (1972) "Mbi të folmen 
Shqipe të Peshterit," in Gjurmime Albanologjike. 

(d) G.P. Anagnostopulos (1926). Tsakonische Grammatik, Berlin-
Athen.

Once again, many thanks to those of you who replied. My deepest 
apologies if I have misrepresented any of your responses. 

Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics
                     Phonetics

-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-21-2719	