21.3855, Calls: Germanic, General Ling, Historical Ling/USA
linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Sun Oct 3 02:17:36 UTC 2010
LINGUIST List: Vol-21-3855. Sat Oct 02 2010. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.
Subject: 21.3855, Calls: Germanic, General Ling, Historical Ling/USA
Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Reviews: Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin-Madison
Eric Raimy, U of Wisconsin-Madison
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin-Madison
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin-Madison
<reviews at linguistlist.org>
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/
The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University,
and donations from subscribers and publishers.
Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny <di at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature:
Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility
designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process
abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom,
and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts,
submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
===========================Directory==============================
1)
Date: 30-Sep-2010
From: Justin Glover < germconf at indiana.edu >
Subject: 8th Biennial Graduate Student Conference
-------------------------Message 1 ----------------------------------
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 22:16:16
From: Justin Glover [germconf at indiana.edu]
Subject: 8th Biennial Graduate Student Conference
E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=21-3855.html&submissionid=2649906&topicid=3&msgnumber=1
Full Title: 8th Biennial Graduate Student Conference
Date: 25-Feb-2011 - 27-Feb-2011
Location: Bloomington, Indiana, USA
Contact Person: Justin Glover
Meeting Email: germconf at indiana.edu
Web Site: http://www.indiana.edu/~germconf/
Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics; Historical Linguistics
Language Family(ies): Germanic
Call Deadline: 15-Nov-2010
Meeting Description:
This conference concerns itself with opacity and meaning in Germanic
linguistics, language, and culture.
Potential topics may include, but are not limited to, the following areas of
inquiry, with a special focus on matters relevant to the Germanic languages:
1. Historical Linguistics: comparative methods/reconstruction; limitations of
manuscript/inscription evidence; gaps in the data and their implications;
principles and models of historical change
2. Phonology/Phonetics/Morphology: underlying representations; opacity
phenomena (underapplication/overapplication); rules of (supposed)
absolute neutralization
3. OT: Paradigm Uniformity; Stratal OT; models of variation
4. Syntax: Transformation/Movement (with and without traces); barriers to
movements
5. Second Language Acquisition: learnability problems; overgeneralization
and undergeneralization; positive & negative evidence
6. Psycholinguistics: evaluation of measurement instruments and their
potential to indicate 'competence' rather than only 'performance'
7. Sociolinguistics: principles and mechanisms of variation and dialect
change
8. Pragmatics: discourse analysis; 'reading between the lines' for linguistic
generalizations
Call For Papers
The Critical Blot: Opacity and Meaning in German Linguistics, Literature,
and Culture
Keynote Address: Benjamin Bennett (University of Virginia)
Plenary Address: Joe Salmons (University of Wisconsin-Madison)
Modern linguistics has turned from mere etymologies to the search for the
abstract laws of languages, beginning as early as August Wilhelm von
Schlegel's 1815 condemnation of the philological irregularities in Grimms'
Altdeutsche Wälder. Linguists such as the German Jacob Grimm and the
Dane Rasmus Christian Rask began to answer this call. This path arguably
led to the advent of the Neogrammarian hypothesis at the University of
Leipzig in the late 19th-century, which is associated with names such as
Verner, Sievers, Braune, Behagel, Osthoff, Paul, Noreen, Brugmann,
Delbrück and Leskien.
The surface form, i.e., what we actually see and hear of language, is
relatively easy to observe. On the other hand, what lies behind the surface
has driven analyses and entire theories of linguistics and has led to the
development of myriad scholastic and empirical methods. These in turn
have led to reconstructed historical forms, abstract underlying forms,
conspiracies of rules, and constraints that suggest linguistic objects that
never appear on the surface. At what point do the data block us from
deeper inquiry beyond speculation? Is a better, more perceptive method of
inquiry or type of evidence possible? What paths lie before us, as yet
unexplored, in our continuous quest to quantify and formalize languages?
Deadline for Abstracts: November 15, 2010
Please send a 1-2 page anonymous abstract, with a separate cover sheet
indicating the author's name, affiliation, address, and e-mail address to:
germconf at indiana.edu
For more information, visit: http://www.indiana.edu/~germconf/
-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-21-3855
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list