22.759, Disc: Linguistics as Methodology in Social Research

linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Tue Feb 15 03:26:51 UTC 2011


LINGUIST List: Vol-22-759. Mon Feb 14 2011. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 22.759, Disc: Linguistics as Methodology in Social Research

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Veronika Drake, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Eric Raimy, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Elyssa Winzeler <elyssa at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 13-Feb-2011
From: Fergal Treanor [fergal_treanor at hotmail.com]
Subject: Linguistics as Methodology in Social Research
 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:25:12
From: Fergal Treanor [fergal_treanor at hotmail.com]
Subject: Linguistics as Methodology in Social Research

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=22-759.html&submissionid=4496516&topicid=5&msgnumber=1
  


Dear Linguists,

Can applied linguistics, pragmatics, discourse analysis etc. be used to
operationalize cultural-theoretical claims about the relationships between
discourse and power?

I ask as a PhD candidate in linguistics who is interested by the compelling
theories of Foucault, and at the same time attaches great significance to
rational, evidence-based argumentation.

What linguistic-theoretical discoveries can be applied to corroborate or
falsify hypotheses about, say, institutional views on higher education
policy? Can anything be 'shown', or must any and all conclusions remain at
the level of 'interpretation'.

I am looking forward to hearing from you, and open to debate and discussion!

Best regards,

Fergal Treanor 


Linguistic Field(s): Discipline of Linguistics
                     Sociolinguistics




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-22-759	
----------------------------------------------------------


	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list