25.3165, Diss: English; Comp Ling, Morphology, Phonology, Text/Corpus Ling: Shih: 'Towards Optimal Rhythm'
The LINGUIST List
linguist at linguistlist.org
Mon Aug 4 11:50:24 UTC 2014
LINGUIST List: Vol-25-3165. Mon Aug 04 2014. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.
Subject: 25.3165, Diss: English; Comp Ling, Morphology, Phonology, Text/Corpus Ling: Shih: 'Towards Optimal Rhythm'
Moderators: Damir Cavar, Eastern Michigan U <damir at linguistlist.org>
Malgorzata E. Cavar, Eastern Michigan U <gosia at linguistlist.org>
Reviews: reviews at linguistlist.org
Anthony Aristar <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Aristar-Dry <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Mateja Schuck, U of Wisconsin Madison
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org
Do you want to donate to LINGUIST without spending an extra penny? Bookmark
the Amazon link for your country below; then use it whenever you buy from
Amazon!
USA: http://www.amazon.com/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-20
Britain: http://www.amazon.co.uk/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-21
Germany: http://www.amazon.de/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistd-21
Japan: http://www.amazon.co.jp/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-22
Canada: http://www.amazon.ca/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistc-20
France: http://www.amazon.fr/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistf-21
For more information on the LINGUIST Amazon store please visit our
FAQ at http://linguistlist.org/amazon-faq.cfm.
Editor for this issue: Danuta Allen <danuta at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 07:48:30
From: Stephanie Shih [shih at ucmerced.edu]
Subject: Towards Optimal Rhythm
E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=25-3165.html&submissionid=35796558&topicid=14&msgnumber=1
Institution: Stanford University
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2014
Author: Stephanie Sin-Yun Shih
Dissertation Title: Towards Optimal Rhythm
Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics
Morphology
Phonology
Text/Corpus Linguistics
Subject Language(s): English (eng)
Dissertation Director(s):
Sharon Inkelas
Arto Anttila
Dissertation Abstract:
This thesis argues that rhythmic well-formedness preferences contribute to
conditioning morphosyntactic choices, providing evidence from patterns in
language use that constraints on phonological constructs are at work in the
assessment of competing morphosyntactic variants. The results of the thesis
call into question a fundamental empirical assumption underlying many
standard models of grammar and of language production: that metrical or
segmental phonology cannot influence morphosyntactic encoding.
Phonologically-conditioned morphological phenomena are of familiar stock.
Phonological constraints can force blocking of morphological processes and
combinatorics, resulting in a number of repair strategies: re-ordering,
periphrasis, deletion, and suppletion. It is shown in this thesis that
phonologically-conditioned syntactic phenomena follow a similar typological
spread. The same phonological constraints that interfere with morphology
also operate across word and phrase boundaries, triggering repairs of word
(re-)ordering, periphrasis/paraphrasing, deletion, and suppletion (i.e., lexeme
replacement).
Two empirical studies of the rhythmic conditioning of word choice (e.g.,
personal name choice) and syntactic choice (e.g., genitive alternation) in
English are presented. The case studies demonstrate that rhythmic
optimization, in addition to other phonological well-formedness preferences
such as phonotactic co-occurrence restrictions, are active in word and
construction variation in syntagmatic contexts. It is furthermore shown that the
effect of rhythm is closely tied to semantic factors such as animacy, which
reveals that rhythm must interact and compete with non-phonological
constraints in the system.
Allowing interaction between phonological material and morphosyntactic
choices raises the issue of how much surface and underlying phonetic and
phonological information is available at the point of morphosyntactic
computation. Rhythm offers a natural test case of the availability of underlying
versus post-lexically specified information via the distinction in stress
properties of lexical (content) and grammatical (function) words. A large-scale
corpus study of content and function word stress in conversational American
English is presented. Results of the study point to complex differences
between word categories in terms of underlying and surface stress properties.
These differences in stress not only trigger differences in rhythmic
optimization by word category but they also demonstrate that morphosyntactic
competitors are assessed without consideration of the potential output of
surface rhythmic optimization. In contrast, evidence from end weight
phenomena suggests that lexically-encoded information about underlying
phonological stress is available during morphosyntactic computation.
The view that emerges from the empirical studies in this thesis is one that
allows for potential phonological influence on morphological and syntactic
outputs. The phonological constraints that are most active will necessarily be
ones that regulate syntagmatic effects that occur when words combine in the
morphosyntax, and these phonological constraints—including the propensity
towards optimal rhythm—must compete for satisfaction against other active,
non-phonological pressures.
----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-25-3165
----------------------------------------------------------
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list