26.794, Calls: Phonology/Poland
The LINGUIST List via LINGUIST
linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Fri Feb 6 23:13:34 UTC 2015
LINGUIST List: Vol-26-794. Fri Feb 06 2015. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.
Subject: 26.794, Calls: Phonology/Poland
Moderators: linguist at linguistlist.org (Damir Cavar, Malgorzata E. Cavar)
Reviews: reviews at linguistlist.org (Anthony Aristar, Helen Aristar-Dry, Sara Couture)
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org
Editor for this issue: Anna White <awhite at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 18:13:26
From: Geoff Schwartz [geoff at wa.amu.edu.pl]
Subject: Does Phonology Have Heads?
Full Title: Does Phonology Have Heads?
Date: 17-Sep-2015 - 19-Sep-2015
Location: Poznan, Poland
Contact Person: Geoff Schwartz
Meeting Email: geoff at wa.amu.edu.pl
Linguistic Field(s): Phonology
Call Deadline: 01-Mar-2015
Meeting Description:
Does phonology have heads?
Convenors: Geoff Schwartz, UAM Poznan & Shanti Ulfsbjorninn, University College London
Descriptions of both syntactic and phonological structure frequently make reference to the term head to characterize the relationship between two or more features contained in a single linguistic domain - the head is always the 'more important' of the two entities. In syntax, this relationship appears to be relatively straightforward.
In phonology, on the other hand, defining 'headedness', if it even exists, is not so easy. One problem it is not clear exactly which phonological entities may serve as 'heads'. Some theories refer to obligatory items like vocalic nuclei, yet this definition may run afoul of phonetic and functional principles. Consonants clearly play a greater functional role than vowels in the formation of lexical contrasts, as anyone who has ever sent an abbreviated text message, or studied Semitic morphology, can attest. In Element Theory, it is common to claim that headedness is a fundamental principle of segmental representations, yet it is not clear how this relates to larger constituents. Metrical theory is another area in which the notion of the head may carry some meaning.
2nd Call for Papers:
In keeping with the PLM leitmotif of ‘understanding linguistic concepts’, our session seeks to probe the question of headedness in phonology. We especially welcome abstracts that address the following questions:
- Is headedness really a phonological property or can it be subsumed by other principles?
- Which types of phonological entities is headedness relevant for?
- Does headedness require binary structures?
- What kind of evidence may be used to support or falsify claims of headedness?
The deadline for abstracts is March 1, 2015. For abstract submission guidelines, see the following link: http://wa.amu.edu.pl/plm/2015/PLM2013_Abstract_submission
----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-26-794
----------------------------------------------------------
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list