27.2394, Calls: Discourse Analysis, Ling Theories, Psycholing, Cog Sci, Comp Ling/Germany
The LINGUIST List via LINGUIST
linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Tue May 31 13:27:44 UTC 2016
LINGUIST List: Vol-27-2394. Tue May 31 2016. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.
Subject: 27.2394, Calls: Discourse Analysis, Ling Theories, Psycholing, Cog Sci, Comp Ling/Germany
Moderators: linguist at linguistlist.org (Damir Cavar, Malgorzata E. Cavar)
Reviews: reviews at linguistlist.org (Anthony Aristar, Helen Aristar-Dry, Robert Coté, Sara Couture)
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org
***************** LINGUIST List Support *****************
Fund Drive 2016
25 years of LINGUIST List!
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
Editor for this issue: Anna White <awhite at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 09:26:52
From: Katja Suckow [katja.suckow at phil.uni-goettingen.de]
Subject: Information Structuring in Discourse
Full Title: Information Structuring in Discourse
Date: 08-Mar-2017 - 10-Mar-2017
Location: Saarbrücken, Germany
Contact Person: Katja Suckow
Meeting Email: katja.suckow at phil.uni-goettingen.de
Web Site: http://dgfs2017.uni-saarland.de/wordpress/
Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science; Computational Linguistics; Discourse Analysis; Linguistic Theories; Psycholinguistics
Call Deadline: 31-Jul-2016
Meeting Description:
This working session is part of the DGfS 2017 meeting in Saarbrücken, Germany.
Although the need to model the relation between linguistic features of
utterances and discourse structure is commonly acknowledged (cf. [2],[1],[3],
among others), there is still much debate about what ought to be the
appropriate level of analysis of discourse segmentation and what the criteria
to identify units of discourse structure are. In previous research, it has
been suggested that discourse structure might be defined either in terms of
communicative intention, attention, topic structure, speech acts, coherence
relations, cohesive devices, or others. Related to this, it is still under
discussion whether intonational phrases, syntactic clauses or semantic
events/propositions form appropriate building blocks for recognizing units of
discourse structure. In addition, there is no consensus whether discourse
segments can be recursively embedded or not. On the other hand, discourse
units have also been utilized to explain processing preferences observed in
different empirical domains such as anaphora resolution, clause combining,
grounding, etc. These issues are of interest from a theoretical as well as a
processing perspective.
The aim of this working section is to bring together researchers from the
broad field of discourse segmentation to discuss information structuring
during discourse processing. We particularly welcome contributions (in English
or German) from researchers who theoretically focus on models of discourse
representation, or from experimentalists who investigate the interplay of
linguistic cues and discourse segmentation to model processing preferences
using different experimental methods. We are also interested in contributions
which approach the topic cross-linguistically, historically or from a
computational perspective.
Invited Speakers:
Nicholas Asher (Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse)
Hannah Rohde (University of Edinburgh)
Organizers:
Anke Holler (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen)
Katja Suckow (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen)
Barbara Hemforth (Université Paris Diderot)
Israel de la Fuente (Université Paris Diderot)
[1] Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides (2003). Logics of Conversation.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[2] Grosz, Barbara J. and Candace L. Sidner (1986). Attention, intention, and
the structure of discourse. Computational
Linguistics 12(3). 175–204.
[3] Kehler, Andrew, Laura Kertz, Hannah Rohde, and Jeffrey L. Elman (2008).
Coherence and coreference revisited.
Journal of Semantics 25(1). 1–44.
Call for Papers:
We invite abstracts for talks (about 20mins + 10mins for discussion) for the
working session ''Information structuring in discourse'' to take place during
the 39th Annual Meeting of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft,
March 8-10, 2017 Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany
The aim of this working section is to bring together researchers from the
broad field of discourse segmentation to discuss information structuring
during discourse processing. We particularly welcome contributions (in English
or German) from researchers who theoretically focus on models of discourse
representation, or from experimentalists who investigate the interplay of
linguistic cues and discourse segmentation to model processing preferences
using different experimental methods. We are also interested in contributions
which approach the topic cross-linguistically, historically or from a
computational perspective.
Abstracts should not exceed 2 pages, including all examples and references.
Please submit your anonymous abstracts (write your author information and
affiliations in the body of your email) in pdf format to
katja.suckow at phil.uni-goettingen.de by July 31, 2016.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
***************** LINGUIST List Support *****************
Fund Drive 2016
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
This year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $79,000. This money
will go to help keep the List running by supporting all of our
Student Editors for the coming year.
Don't forget to check out Fund Drive 2016 site!
http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/
For all information on donating, including information on how to
donate by check, money order, PayPal or wire transfer, please visit:
http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Indiana University and
as such can receive donations through Indiana University Foundation. We
also collect donations via eLinguistics Foundation, a registered 501(c)
Non Profit organization with the federal tax number 45-4211155. Either
way, the donations can be offset against your federal and sometimes your
state tax return (U.S. tax payers only). For more information visit the
IRS Web-Site, or contact your financial advisor.
Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that
they will match any gift you make to a non-profit organization.
Normally this entails your contacting your human resources department
and sending us a form that the Indiana University Foundation fills in
and returns to your employer. This is generally a simple administrative
procedure that doubles the value of your gift to LINGUIST, without
costing you an extra penny. Please take a moment to check if
your company operates such a program.
Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!
----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-27-2394
----------------------------------------------------------
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list