28.3312, Qs: Question about History of the Word: Cleave
The LINGUIST List
linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Fri Aug 4 15:29:35 UTC 2017
LINGUIST List: Vol-28-3312. Fri Aug 04 2017. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.
Subject: 28.3312, Qs: Question about History of the Word: Cleave
Moderators: linguist at linguistlist.org (Damir Cavar, Malgorzata E. Cavar)
Reviews: reviews at linguistlist.org (Helen Aristar-Dry, Robert Coté,
Michael Czerniakowski)
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
Editor for this issue: Kenneth Steimel <ken at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 11:29:28
From: Mark Burns [mburns_08109 at comcast.net]
Subject: Question about History of the Word: Cleave
If you look up the English verb cleave online you will find two diametrically
opposing meanings.
One is essentially ''to split apart'', and the other is ''to hold together''.
I find this dichotomy curious, and I'm wondering which meaning is the
predecessor of the other? What is it (about us, or about our use/abuse of
language) that can lead to the same word having such dual and diametrically
opposing meanings?
Linguistic Field(s): Anthropological Linguistics
General Linguistics
Historical Linguistics
Linguistic Theories
Morphology
Psycholinguistics
Sociolinguistics
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
***************** LINGUIST List Support *****************
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-28-3312
----------------------------------------------------------
Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated
from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:
http://multitree.org/
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list