29.2210, Calls: Phonology/USA

[The LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List: Vol-29-2210. Tue May 22 2018. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 29.2210, Calls: Phonology/USA

Moderators: linguist at linguistlist.org (Damir Cavar, Malgorzata E. Cavar)
Reviews: reviews at linguistlist.org (Helen Aristar-Dry, Robert Coté,
                                   Michael Czerniakowski)
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
           http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

Editor for this issue: Kenneth Steimel <ken at linguistlist.org>
================================================================


Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 09:55:04
From: Arto Anttila [anttila at stanford.edu]
Subject: Analyzing Typological Structure: From Categorical to Probabilistic Phonology

 
Full Title: Analyzing Typological Structure: From Categorical to Probabilistic Phonology 

Date: 22-Sep-2018 - 22-Sep-2018
Location: Stanford, California, USA 
Contact Person: Arto Anttila
Meeting Email: anttila at stanford.edu
Web Site: https://sites.google.com/site/analyzingtypologicalstructure/ 

Linguistic Field(s): Phonology 

Call Deadline: 25-Jun-2018 

Meeting Description:

The Department of Linguistics at Stanford University and the Stanford
Humanities Center will host a one-day workshop dedicated to exploring the
typological limits of probabilistic phonological grammars. The workshop is
partially funded by the France-Stanford Center for Interdisciplinary Studies
as part of the project The Mathematics of Language Universals.

Location: Stanford University

Workshop date: Saturday, September 22, 2018

Invited speaker: Prof. Bruce Hayes, UCLA

More information: https://sites.google.com/site/analyzingtypologicalstructure/

Organizers: Arto Anttila (Stanford) and Giorgio Magri (CNRS)


Call for Papers:

A basic question in theoretical phonology is what a theory includes and what
it excludes.  A good theory should be flexible enough to closely fit the data
at hand, but it should also have empirical typological content and exclude
unnatural patterns. In terms of empirical fit modern phonological theories are
ambitious and successful. In terms of typological content their predictions
are often obscure and sometimes unknown.

The typological limits of phonological theories have been studied from various
perspectives, including formal language theory (Johnson 1972, Kaplan & Kay
1994, Chandlee & Heinz 2017), factorial typologies (Prince and Smolensky
1993), Property Theory (Alber, DelBusso, & Prince 2016), algebraic methods
(Merchant & Riggle 2016), and T-orders (Anttila & Magri 2018). These
theoretical developments have in turn produced useful software, including
finite-state tools (Beesley and Karttunen 2003, Huldén 2017), OTSoft (Hayes,
Tesar, & Zuraw 2017), OTHelp (Staubs, Becker, Potts, Pratt, McCarthy, & Pater
2010), OTKit (Biró 2010), PyPhon (Riggle, Bane, & Bowman 2011), OTWorkplace
(Prince, Tesar, & Merchant 2012), T-Order Generator (Anttila and Andrus 2006),
and OTOrder (Djalali & Jeffers 2015), among others. These tools make it
possible to explore the typological predictions of large and complex models
that progressively approximate the empirical complexity of natural language
phonology.

A major obstacle that stands in the way of progress is that typological
analysis tools usually only apply to categorical models. Over the past two
decades many phonologists have turned to quantitative data and worked
extensively on patterns of stochastic variation and gradient acceptability.
Such analyses often invoke probabilistic grammars, such as Stochastic OT
(Boersma and Hayes 2001), Noisy Harmonic Grammar (Boersma and Pater 2016), and
MaxEnt (Goldwater and Johnson 2003, Hayes and Wilson 2008). This work
typically has the goal of showing that the models are rich enough to avoid
undergeneration, but less attention has been paid to the question of
overgeneration. The key question is how to analyze the typological structure
induced by probabilistic models. The question is not trivial: while the
typologies predicted by categorical phonology are usually finite,
probabilistic frameworks generate an infinite family of different probability
distributions.

We invite abstracts (1-2 pages, pdf) for a 30-minute talk, followed by a
15-minute discussion. We welcome submissions that address questions of the
following type:

- What do probabilistic typologies look like?
- How can one effectively compute probabilistic typologies?
- Do probabilistic grammars overgenerate?
- How can one tell whether probabilistic typologies contain crazy grammars?
- How do Optimality Theory, Harmonic Grammar, and MaxEnt differ typologically?
- What is the relationship between learnability and overgeneration? 
- Do learnability arguments trump tight typological predictions?

Abstracts should be emailed to anttila at stanford.edu (Anttila) and
magrigrg at gmail.com (Magri)

Abstract submission deadline: June 25, 2018, 11:59pm PST

Notification of acceptance: July 9, 2018.

Our goal is to have a relatively small number of talks and plenty of time for
informal interaction.

More information: https://sites.google.com/site/analyzingtypologicalstructure/
Organizers: Arto Anttila (Stanford) and Giorgio Magri (CNRS)




------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*****************    LINGUIST List Support    *****************
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:

              The IU Foundation Crowd Funding site:
       https://iufoundation.fundly.com/the-linguist-list

               The LINGUIST List FundDrive Page:
            http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
 


----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-29-2210	
----------------------------------------------------------