32.1802, Diss: English; Linguistic Theories; Pragmatics; Semantics; Syntax; Text/Corpus Linguistics: Pascal Hohaus: '' Subordinating Modalities - A Quantitative Analysis of Syntactically Dependent Modal Verb Constructions''
The LINGUIST List
linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Mon May 24 17:28:21 UTC 2021
LINGUIST List: Vol-32-1802. Mon May 24 2021. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.
Subject: 32.1802, Diss: English; Linguistic Theories; Pragmatics; Semantics; Syntax; Text/Corpus Linguistics: Pascal Hohaus: '' Subordinating Modalities - A Quantitative Analysis of Syntactically Dependent Modal Verb Constructions''
Moderator: Malgorzata E. Cavar (linguist at linguistlist.org)
Student Moderator: Jeremy Coburn, Lauren Perkins
Managing Editor: Becca Morris
Team: Helen Aristar-Dry, Everett Green, Sarah Robinson, Nils Hjortnaes, Joshua Sims, Billy Dickson
Jobs: jobs at linguistlist.org | Conferences: callconf at linguistlist.org | Pubs: pubs at linguistlist.org
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
Editor for this issue: Sarah Robinson <srobinson at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 13:28:14
From: Pascal Hohaus [pascal.hohaus at engsem.uni-hannover.de]
Subject: Subordinating Modalities - A Quantitative Analysis of Syntactically Dependent Modal Verb Constructions
Institution: Leibniz University Hannover
Program: English Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2020
Author: Pascal Hohaus
Dissertation Title: Subordinating Modalities - A Quantitative Analysis of
Syntactically Dependent Modal Verb Constructions
Dissertation URL: https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783476056429
Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories
Pragmatics
Semantics
Syntax
Text/Corpus Linguistics
Subject Language(s): English (eng)
Dissertation Director(s):
Rainer Schulze
Martin Hilpert
Dissertation Abstract:
This study is concerned with the use of the English modals (may, might, can,
could, shall, should, will, would and must) in adverbial, relative and
complement clauses. It employs synchronic data from the British National
Corpus and quantitative methods to investigate similarities and differences
between the core modals, as well as modal-specific preferences in subordinate
clauses. The main finding is that modal verbs in subordinate clauses may be
conceived of as meso-constructions and that they qualify as
micro-constructions once further syntagmatic features are considered. This
allows for distinguishing modal verb phrases with different degrees of
complexity, schematicity, productivity and subjectivity. Further applications
give us insights into collocations, modal harmony, semantic preference, and
the attraction of dynamic meaning to relative clauses.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*************************** LINGUIST List Support ***************************
The 2020 Fund Drive is under way! Please visit https://funddrive.linguistlist.org
to find out how to donate and check how your university, country or discipline
ranks in the fund drive challenges. Or go directly to the donation site:
https://crowdfunding.iu.edu/the-linguist-list
Let's make this a short fund drive!
Please feel free to share the link to our campaign:
https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-32-1802
----------------------------------------------------------
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list