32.1869, Diss: Niger-Congo; Semantics; Syntax: Ngoungouo Yiagnigni Abass: ''The syntax-semantics of relative clauses in Shupamem''
The LINGUIST List
linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Fri May 28 22:27:16 UTC 2021
LINGUIST List: Vol-32-1869. Fri May 28 2021. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.
Subject: 32.1869, Diss: Niger-Congo; Semantics; Syntax: Ngoungouo Yiagnigni Abass: ''The syntax-semantics of relative clauses in Shupamem''
Moderator: Malgorzata E. Cavar (linguist at linguistlist.org)
Student Moderator: Jeremy Coburn, Lauren Perkins
Managing Editor: Becca Morris
Team: Helen Aristar-Dry, Everett Green, Sarah Robinson, Nils Hjortnaes, Joshua Sims, Billy Dickson
Jobs: jobs at linguistlist.org | Conferences: callconf at linguistlist.org | Pubs: pubs at linguistlist.org
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
Editor for this issue: Sarah Robinson <srobinson at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 18:26:57
From: Ngoungouo Abass [abass.ngoungouo at univ-yaounde1.cm]
Subject: The syntax-semantics of relative clauses in Shupamem
Institution: University of Yaounde I
Program: African Languages and Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2021
Author: Ngoungouo Yiagnigni Abass
Dissertation Title: The syntax-semantics of relative clauses in Shupamem
Linguistic Field(s): Semantics
Syntax
Language Family(ies): Niger-Congo
Dissertation Director(s):
Florence Tabe Oben
Dissertation Abstract:
The thesis examines the syntactic and semantic properties of relative clauses
in Shupamem, a Grassfield Bantu language spoken in the Noun Division of the
West Region of Cameroon. It is analyzed based on the generative procedure, in
particular, the Minimalist framework of Chomsky (1995 and subsequent works).
Cartography (Rizzi 1997) comes in to complement the application of the
Minimalist literature. Because the semantic features are indispensable in the
sentence legibility at LF, these must be matched and valued with the truth
conditional value of the verbs in the relative clause to satisfy Full
Interpretation at the interfaces. Therefore, in addition to alluding to the
Minimalist Program to account for relative clauses in Shupamem, focus is also
on the semantic properties of the relative constructions. The objective is to
identify and analyze characteristic properties of the syntax and semantics of
these constructions in Shupamem. The semantic framework adopted in this study
is the Lexical Semantics Approach (Cruse 1986), complemented by the Conceptual
Semantics Approach (Jackendoff 1983). From a typology of relative clause
constructions, the study shows how Shupamem converges with and diverges from
other languages. The relative particles in Shupamem are discontinuous
morphemes having polysemous and multifunctional interpretation. The
investigation of the co-occurrence relations between relative clauses and
other clause constructions comprising questions, focus, topics, negations etc.
revealed some alternations of positions between the relativizers and otherwise
morphemes of the aforementioned clauses. The study also revealed that while
some types of relative clauses (embedded, finite, restrictive,
non-restrictive) are licensed in Shupamem, some others (headless and
non-finite) are not. Moreover, the relativization strategy attested in this
language is pronoun retention and the derivation strategy that best describes
relative clauses is the Head Raising Analysis, whereby the antecedent is
generated inside the relative clause before being extracted to the main
clause. The extraction site of the antecedent is filled by a resumptive
pronoun. Finally, the semantic features of the relativized head noun must
match with the truth-value of the verb of the relative clause for the
construction to be legible at LF.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*************************** LINGUIST List Support ***************************
The 2020 Fund Drive is under way! Please visit https://funddrive.linguistlist.org
to find out how to donate and check how your university, country or discipline
ranks in the fund drive challenges. Or go directly to the donation site:
https://crowdfunding.iu.edu/the-linguist-list
Let's make this a short fund drive!
Please feel free to share the link to our campaign:
https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-32-1869
----------------------------------------------------------
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list