33.2607, Calls: Discourse Analysis/Belgium

[The LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List: Vol-33-2607. Fri Aug 26 2022. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 33.2607, Calls: Discourse Analysis/Belgium

Moderator: Malgorzata E. Cavar (linguist at linguistlist.org)
Student Moderator: Billy Dickson
Managing Editor: Lauren Perkins
Team: Helen Aristar-Dry, Everett Green, Sarah Goldfinch, Nils Hjortnaes,
        Joshua Sims, Billy Dickson, Amalia Robinson, Matthew Fort
Jobs: jobs at linguistlist.org | Conferences: callconf at linguistlist.org | Pubs: pubs at linguistlist.org

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Hosted by Indiana University

Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
           https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

Editor for this issue: Everett Green <everett at linguistlist.org>
================================================================


Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 04:16:36
From: Dominika Baran [dominika.baran at duke.edu]
Subject: On pragmatics and 'Peach Tree Dishes': Discourses of far-right extremism, conspiracy, and solidarity

 
Full Title: On pragmatics and 'Peach Tree Dishes': Discourses of far-right extremism, conspiracy, and solidarity 

Date: 09-Jul-2023 - 14-Jul-2023
Location: Brussels, Belgium 
Contact Person: catherine tebaldi
Meeting Email: cat.tebaldi at gmail.com

Linguistic Field(s): Discourse Analysis 

Call Deadline: 01-Nov-2022 

Meeting Description:

Although often dismissed by both academics and progressive voters as
nonsensical and irrelevant fringe ideas, far-right conspiracy narratives in
fact present complex, multimodal, and affective discourses that contest,
co-opt, and connect to mainstream and official knowledges, and as such become
increasingly normalized, accepted, and influential. Responding to the 2023
IPrA conference theme of exceptionality and ordinariness, this panel explores
the conflicting (meta)pragmatic regimentation and unruliness of digital
discourses of far-right politics, of our complicity in them (Verschueren 2021)
or contestation of them. Digital, multimodal discourses can co-opt the
language of the ordinary to promote exceptional conspiracy narratives as, for
example, meat eating in Marjorie Taylor Greene’s recent evocation of the
supposedly outrageous notion of growing meat in a “peach tree dish” (sic!)
which aligned the replacement of meat with the replacement of white men.
Alternatively, they banalize the language of progressive values: COVID
anti-vaccine advocates have co-opted the slogan of reproductive rights
activists, “my body, my choice,” in protest signs in Ireland, UK, US, and
elsewhere (Strange 2021), while in Poland, anti-genderist politicians and
media have sought to resignify the LGBTQ+ symbol of the rainbow as an index of
sinful, immoral, and unpatriotic ideologies (Baran 2022). Perhaps most
perplexingly, the reactionary right sometimes takes up the language of
critique (Tebaldi 2021) and creates a popular, pseudo-linguistic analysis
around the ordinariness of words, claiming that it is the progressives who
twist and denaturalize the “true” meaning of words and concepts such as, for
example, “marriage,” “freedom,” or “patriotism.” Given the global influence of
rightwing languages of hate, this panel aims to examine and demystify their
discursive operation in various national, regional, and local contexts, but
also to engage with existing counter-discourses that seek to disrupt rightwing
attempts at co-opting and perverting progressive terms and ideas. This latter
focus is crucial because, as Borba (2018) convincingly argues, “hatred is past
oriented” (177) whereas “acts of hope” (174) look to the future and to the
potential for checking and pushing against acts of hate. Consequently, we
invite contributions to the panel that include but are not limited to:
theoretical exploration of contestations and different uptakes of discourses,
exploration of rightwing protest discourses (e.g. anti-vaccine,
anti-reproductive rights, conspirituality, and others), the new solidarities
produced between but also, crucially, against these, and attempts at
disrupting these rightwing uptakes through oppositional discourses of hope. We
welcome methodological and theoretical approaches including, but not limited
to: Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse Historical Analysis, semiotic
analysis, multimodal discourse analysis, media discourse, Conversation
Analysis, interactional sociolinguistics, narrative analysis, computational
sociolinguistics, corpus analysis, critical sociolinguistics, and other
discourse analysis and/or digital analysis approaches.


Call for Papers:

https://pragmatics.international/page/CfP

Please feel free to contact session organizers, Dominika Baran
(dominika.baran at duke.edu) and Cat Tebaldi (cat.tebaldi at gmail.com) with any
questions about the session.




------------------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************    LINGUIST List Support    ***************************
 The 2020 Fund Drive is under way! Please visit https://funddrive.linguistlist.org
  to find out how to donate and check how your university, country or discipline
     ranks in the fund drive challenges. Or go directly to the donation site:
                   https://crowdfunding.iu.edu/the-linguist-list

                        Let's make this a short fund drive!
                Please feel free to share the link to our campaign:
                    https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
 


----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-33-2607	
----------------------------------------------------------