36.527, Confs: Linguistic Theories; Pragmatics; Semantics; Syntax; Typology / Portugal

[The LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List: Vol-36-527. Sat Feb 08 2025. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 36.527, Confs: Linguistic Theories; Pragmatics; Semantics; Syntax; Typology / Portugal

Moderator: Steven Moran (linguist at linguistlist.org)
Managing Editor: Justin Fuller
Team: Helen Aristar-Dry, Steven Franks, Joel Jenkins, Daniel Swanson, Erin Steitz
Jobs: jobs at linguistlist.org | Conferences: callconf at linguistlist.org | Pubs: pubs at linguistlist.org

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Editor for this issue: Erin Steitz <ensteitz at linguistlist.org>

================================================================


Date: 08-Feb-2025
From: Jakob Maché [jakob.mache at letras.ulisboa.pt]
Subject: Minor Sentence Types


Minor Sentence Types

Date: 04-Sep-2025 - 04-Sep-2025
Location: Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Contact: Jakob Maché
Contact Email: jakob.mache at letras.ulisboa.pt

Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories; Pragmatics; Semantics;
Syntax; Typology

The large bulk of research in syntax and sentential semantics focuses
on assertive declarative clauses, information seeking interrogative
clauses, and, to a much lesser extent, imperatives. A key concept for
the understanding of word order variation and prosodic prominence was
introduced by Roberts (2012) and Ginzburg (1996) in form of the
Question Under Discussion (QUD). As has been shown on various
occasions, different word order permutations and stress patterns
express different focus placement. Focused constituents typically
occupy a prominent position in the clause or exhibit more prominent
prosodic features. The placement and the prosodic properties of
focussed constituents is determined by QUD. To gain a deeper
understanding of these major sentence types and their interaction with
the discourse, it is often productive to analyse the internal
structure of minor sentence types. Minor sentence types frequently
differ from major ones in that they (i) lack features that are
characteristic of major sentence types such as overt subjects, finite
verbs—or verbs all together; (ii) exhibit unusual word order and/or
prosody, as seen in English exclamatives (What small hands!), (iii) or
they exhibit segmental material, such as particles or markers, that
does not occur in other sentence types.
Among the minor sentence types are those identified by König and
Siemund (2007), Evans (2007) and Altmann, Meibauer, and Steinbach
(2013). These are listed below and supplemented here by further types:
1. Imperatives and prohibitives lacking overt subjects in many
languages (cf. Schmerling 1982, Kaufmann 2012, Condoravdi and Lauer
2012), also in Meithei (Tibeto-Burman, cf. Chelliah 1997) .
2. Exclamatives in many Indo-European languages characterised by
unusual intonation and/or word order (Michaelis and Lambrecht 1996,
Zanuttini and Portner 2003).
3. Optatives in Germanic (cf. Grosz 2012, Grosz 2013) and in Meithei
(Tibeto-Burman) , (cf. Chelliah 1997).
4. Rhetorical questions (Dehé and Braun 2019, Farkas 2020).
5. Deliberative self-adressed questions.
6. Other non-canonical questions (cf. Trotzke 2023).
7. Echo questions A: I tell you he is a braggart – B: He is what? (cf.
Beck and Reis 2018).
8. Declarative questions in Germanic languages (cf. Gunlogson 2001).
9. What if questions (cf. Bledin and Rawlins 2019, Li and Liu 2023).
10. Directive root infinitives in Germanic and elsewhere (cf. Reis
1985, Schwabe 1994, Reis 1995,
Gärtner 2013, Gärtner 2014, Gärtner 2017) and wh-root infinitives
(cf.Reis 2003)
11. Non-finite presentatives/mad magazin sentences: Him play the
piano? Ludicrous! (cf. Akmajian 1984, Lambrecht 1990, Fernández-Pena
and Pérez-Guerra 2024).
12. Verbless utterances such as:
  (a) Verbless directives in West-Germanic languages: Off with his
head! (cf. Jackendoff and Pinker 2005:220, Jacobs 2008:22, Wilder
2008, Ørsnes 2011)
  (b) Directive dative constructions in Russian: khui vojne ‘penis.NOM
war.DAT= f*ck war’.
  (c) Nominal sentences in Afro-Asiatic languages including Arabic,
Biblical Hebrew (cf. Watson 2002), Egyptian Coptic and other (cf.
Callender 1985), Chadic such as Mina (cf. Frajzyngier, Johnston, and
Edwards 2005:273–285) and Wandala (Frajzyngier 2012:317–330). Russian
also exhibits such structures as does Hungarian (Uralic), Warlmanpa
(Pama-Nyungan) spoken in Australia (cf. Browne 2024:401–403), Mapuche
(Araucarian) spoken in Chile (cf. Smeets 2007:143–145).
13. Main clauses that display characteristics of embedded clauses
(insubordination), as suggested by
Evans (2007), such as:
  (a) Verb forms that typically occur only in dependent clauses, such
as the subjunctive in certain
languages.
  (b) Word order variations, such as verb-final sentences in Dutch and
German.
  (c) Sentences headed by complementisers.
14. Short answers and response particles derived from deictic adverbs,
e.g. Portuguese sim, French oui, Polish tak or from finite forms as
Portuguese tá (cf. Ginzburg 2012:217–265).
15. Other non-sentential utterances: hm, huh in English (cf. Ginzburg
2012:217–265) and West-African Atlantic-Congo languages (cf. Painter
1975, Dingemanse, Torreira, and Enfield 2013).
16. Vocatives (Zwicky 1974, Ladd 1978, Portner 2007, Hill 2007, Hill
2022, Portner 2007 Maché 2020, Maché 2025).
17. Evaluative or expessive “vocatives” prevalent in many European
languages such as English you idiot! or Portuguese seu idiota!‘POSS.3S
idiote (cf. Svennung 1958, Rauh 2004, Espinal 2013:120–127, d’Avis and
Meibauer 2013).
18. Greetings (cf. Ginzburg 2012:74–80).
19. Exclamative interjections and evaluative expressions like Wow! or
Oh God! (cf. Ginzburg 2014,Sieberg 2016)
Questions of interest may involve, but are not limited to, various
aspects of the relationship between form and meaning, as illustrated
below:
1. What is the role of finiteness in determining the illocutionary
force? Are certain speech acts dependent on the presence or absence of
finiteness (cf. Nikolaeva 2007, Truckenbrodt 2006, Klein 2008)?
2. What is the role of the QUD in minor sentence types? Is it
necessary to assume QUDs to account for prosodic prominence and/or
word order variation?
3. Which impact does the marked form of minor sentence type have on
what kind of at-issue and/or non-at-issue meaning it may convey (cf.
Potts 2005, Potts 2015)?
4. What is the underlying syntactic representation of defective minor
sentence types? Is their any empirical evidence for covert verbs,
subjects or matrix predicates?
5. Is there any empirical evidence to determine which approach to the
relationship between sentence type and illocutionary force is more
adequate: correspondence approach or derivational approach as proposed
by Reis (1999) and Meibauer (2013)?
This workshop follows the annual HPSG-colloquium but warmly welcomes
contributions from any theoretical framework including
constraint-based theories such as GPSG, HPSG, LFG, CG, CxG and
derivational approaches such as Minimalism. Submissions related to the
application of theoretical linguistics in NLP, as relevant to the
workshop’s theme, are also encouraged. The workshop aims to provide a
forum for proponents of diverse theoretical approaches who are open to
learning from one another.
Submissions should be two pages in length, including data, figures,
and references. They must be submitted in PDF format and should not
include the authors’ names. Authors are also asked to avoid
self-references. All abstracts must be submitted by 30th March, 2025,
via EasyChair.
https://easychair.org/conferences?conf=hpsg2025
Deadline for abstracts: 30th March 2025
Notification of acceptance: 30th April 2025
Date: 4th September 2025 (preceded by the HPSG colloquium on 2nd–3rd
September)
Invited speakers: Jonathan Ginzburg (Laboratoire de linguistique
formelle, Université de Paris)
Conference proceedings submission: 15th October 2025
A call for contributions to the proceedings will be issued after the
conference. The proceedings are going to be an indexed publication;
the contributions will undergo a separate round of reviews. The
proceedings of previous conferences are available at:
https://proceedings.hpsg.xyz/
References can be found on the official call on the website.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

********************** LINGUIST List Support ***********************
Please consider donating to the Linguist List to support the student editors:

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=87C2AXTVC4PP8

LINGUIST List is supported by the following publishers:

Bloomsbury Publishing http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/

Cambridge University Press http://www.cambridge.org/linguistics

Cascadilla Press http://www.cascadilla.com/

De Gruyter Mouton https://cloud.newsletter.degruyter.com/mouton

Elsevier Ltd http://www.elsevier.com/linguistics

John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/

Language Science Press http://langsci-press.org

Multilingual Matters http://www.multilingual-matters.com/

Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke (LOT) http://www.lotpublications.nl/

Oxford University Press http://www.oup.com/us

Wiley http://www.wiley.com


----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-36-527
----------------------------------------------------------